Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr;72(4):399-412.
doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-2004-y. Epub 2016 Jan 4.

The impact of clinical trial monitoring approaches on data integrity and cost--a review of current literature

Affiliations
Review

The impact of clinical trial monitoring approaches on data integrity and cost--a review of current literature

Rasmus Olsen et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Monitoring is a costly requirement when conducting clinical trials. New regulatory guidance encourages the industry to consider alternative monitoring methods to the traditional 100 % source data verification (SDV) approach. The purpose of this literature review is to provide an overview of publications on different monitoring methods and their impact on subject safety data, data integrity, and monitoring cost.

Methods: The literature search was performed by keyword searches in MEDLINE and hand search of key journals. All publications were reviewed for details on how a monitoring approach impacted subject safety data, data integrity, or monitoring costs.

Results: Twenty-two publications were identified. Three publications showed that SDV has some value for detection of not initially reported adverse events and centralized statistical monitoring (CSM) captures atypical trends. Fourteen publications showed little objective evidence of improved data integrity with traditional monitoring such as 100 % SDV and sponsor queries as compared to reduced SDV, CSM, and remote monitoring. Eight publications proposed a potential for significant cost reductions of monitoring by reducing SDV without compromising the validity of the trial results.

Conclusions: One hundred percent SDV is not a rational method of ensuring data integrity and subject safety based on the high cost, and this literature review indicates that reduced SDV is a viable monitoring method. Alternative methods of monitoring such as centralized monitoring utilizing statistical tests are promising alternatives but have limitations as stand-alone tools. Reduced SDV combined with a centralized, risk-based approach may be the ideal solution to reduce monitoring costs while improving essential data quality.

Keywords: Centralized monitoring; Clinical trial monitoring; Remote monitoring; Risk-based monitoring; Source data verification; Statistical monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Drug Inf J. 2011 Jul;45(4):421-430 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):816-23 - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 05;8(12):e81890 - PubMed
    1. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Apr;79(4):660-8 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 2014 Dec 30;33(30):5265-79 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources