Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0146010.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146010. eCollection 2016.

Human Circulating Antibody-Producing B Cell as a Predictive Measure of Mucosal Immunity to Poliovirus

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Human Circulating Antibody-Producing B Cell as a Predictive Measure of Mucosal Immunity to Poliovirus

Ayan Dey et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: The "gold standard" for assessing mucosal immunity after vaccination with poliovirus vaccines consists in measuring virus excretion in stool after challenge with oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV). This testing is time and resource intensive, and development of alternative methods is a priority for accelerating polio eradication. We therefore evaluated circulating antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) as a potential means to evaluate mucosal immunity to poliovirus vaccine.

Methods: 199 subjects, aged 10 years, and previously immunized repeatedly with OPV, were selected. Subjects were assigned to receive either a booster dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV), bivalent OPV (bOPV), or no vaccine. Using a micro-modified whole blood-based ELISPOT assay designed for field setting, circulating poliovirus type-specific IgA- and IgG-ASCs, including gut homing α4β7+ ASCs, were enumerated on days 0 and 7 after booster immunization. In addition, serum samples collected on days 0, 28 and 56 were tested for neutralizing antibody titers against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3. Stool specimens were collected on day 28 (day of bOPV challenge), and on days 31, 35 and 42 and processed for poliovirus isolation.

Results: An IPV dose elicited blood IgA- and IgG-ASC responses in 84.8 to 94.9% of subjects, respectively. In comparison, a bOPV dose evoked corresponding blood ASC responses in 20.0 to 48.6% of subjects. A significant association was found between IgA- and IgG-ASC responses and serum neutralizing antibody titers for poliovirus type 1, 2, 3 (p<0.001). In the IPV group, α4β7+ ASCs accounted for a substantial proportion of IgA-ASCs and the proportion of subjects with a positive α4β7+ IgA-ASC response to poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3 was 62.7%, 89.8% and 45.8%, respectively. A significant association was observed between virus excretion and α4β7+ IgA- and/or IgG-ASC responses to poliovirus type 3 among immunized children; however, only a weak association was found for type 1 poliovirus.

Discussion: Our results suggest that virus-specific blood ASCs, especially for type 3 poliovirus, can serve as surrogate of mucosal immunity after vaccination. Further studies are needed to evaluate the duration of such memory responses and to assess the programmatic utility of this whole blood-based mucosal ASC testing for the polio eradication program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. CONSORT flow diagram of included subjects.
bOPV = bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine; IPV = Inactivated Polio Vaccine; ELISPOT = Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot.
Fig 2
Fig 2
a: Proportion of subjects with α4β7+ ASC IgA and/or IgG response by intervention group and poliovirus serotype. b: Proportion of subjects with total ASC IgA and/or IgG response by intervention group and poliovirus serotype.
Fig 3
Fig 3
a: Proportion of subjects excreting virus after booster vaccination with OPV and IPV vaccines by intervention group and poliovirus serotype. PV1: Poliovirus type 1; PV2: Poliovirus type 2; PV3: Poliovirus type 3; IPV: Inactivated Polio Vaccine; bOPV = bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine. b: Proportion of subjects with immune response after booster vaccination with OPV and IPV vaccines by intervention group and poliovirus serotype.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Progress towards polio eradication worldwide. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2014–2015. 2015;; 90. - PubMed
    1. Hammon WM, Coriell LL, Ludwig EH, Mc AR, Greene AE, Sather GE, et al. Evaluation of Red Cross gamma globulin as a prophylactic agent for poliomyelitis. 5. Reanalysis of results based on laboratory-confirmed cases. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1954;156:21–7. - PubMed
    1. Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals. (WHO/IVB/04.10) Geneva, World Health Organization; 2004. - PubMed
    1. Onorato IM, Modlin JF, McBean AM, Thoms ML, Losonsky GA, Bernier RH. Mucosal immunity induced by enhance-potency inactivated and oral polio vaccines. The Journal of infectious diseases. 1991;163:1–6. - PubMed
    1. Herremans TM, Reimerink JH, Buisman AM, Kimman TG, Koopmans MP. Induction of mucosal immunity by inactivated poliovirus vaccine is dependent on previous mucosal contact with live virus. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 1999;162:5011–8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms