Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;25(1):28-35.
doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101424. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

Impact on the individual: what do patients and carers gain, lose and expect from being involved in research?

Joanne Ashcroft  1 , Til Wykes  1 , Joseph Taylor  2 , Adam Crowther  1 , George Szmukler  3
Affiliations

Impact on the individual: what do patients and carers gain, lose and expect from being involved in research?

Joanne Ashcroft et al. J Ment Health. 2016.

Abstract

Background: Study feasibility and deliverability can benefit from involving patients and carers in the research process, known as patient and public involvement (PPI). There is less evidence on the experiences of patients and carers themselves and we require more information across a range of studies, health conditions and research stages.

Aims: This study explored how patients and carers in eight diagnostic research specialties have been involved in research, their motivations and the impact involvement had on them.

Method: 143 patients and carers across the Clinical Research Network (CRN) responded to an online semi-structured questionnaire (developed using participatory methodology). Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed.

Results: A range of benefits were reported, including providing a life focus and an improved relationship with illness. Less positive experiences regarding time and money and lack of acknowledgement were also reported, along with suggestions for improvement.

Conclusions: PPI confers many benefits on patients and carers which could increase PPI recruitment if made explicit. More involvement in study recruitment and dissemination would increase the effectiveness of PPI input. Involving a more varied socioeconomic demographic and at an earlier stage is vital. Financial support for lower earners and greater feedback following involvement should also be explored.

Keywords: Carers; Clinical Research Network; PPI; healthcare research; patient and public involvement; research involvement; service users.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure A1.
Figure A1.
Themes and nodes (numbers in brackets are numbers of occurrences).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Barber R, Beresford P, Boote J, et al. Evaluating the impact of service user involvement on research: A prospective case study. Int J Consum Stud. 2011;35(6):609–15.
    1. Barnes M, Cotterell P, editors. Bristol; Policy Press: 2011. Critical perspectives on user involvement.
    1. Bellamy G, Gott M, Frey R. ‘It’s my pleasure?’: The views of palliative care patients about being asked to participate in research. Prog Palliat Care. 2011;19(4):159–64.
    1. Boote J, Wong R, Booth A. ‘Talking the talk or walking the walk?’ A bibliometric review of the literature on public involvement in health research published between 1995 and 2009. Health Exp. 2012;18(1):44–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

LinkOut - more resources