Intraoperative factors affecting conversion from cruciate retaining to cruciate substituting in total knee arthroplasty
- PMID: 26733275
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3971-3
Intraoperative factors affecting conversion from cruciate retaining to cruciate substituting in total knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyse the factors affecting the conversion from posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-retaining (CR) to PCL-substituting (PS) prostheses during total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods: A total of 920 TKAs, which had been preoperatively planned to undergo implantation of CR-type prostheses, were reviewed retrospectively. Of these, 83 knees (9.0 %) were converted intraoperatively to PS prostheses. The clinical and radiological factors of the non-converted (CR) and converted (PS) groups were compared. Clinically, age, gender, body mass index, angle of flexion contracture, size of the femoral component, and thickness of the polyethylene insert were compared between the CR and PS groups. Radiologically, the severity of the varus deformity and the posterior tibial slope angle (PSA) were compared between the CR and PS groups.
Results: No significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, range of motion, thickness of the polyethylene insert, or severity of varus deformity were identified. The average preoperative angle of flexion contracture was 5.9° ± 7.4° in the CR group and 8.1° ± 9.1° in the PS group (p = 0.002). The average preoperative PSA was 9.6° ± 4.0° in the CR group and 11.0° ± 5.0° in the PS group (p = 0.018). The conversion rates to a PS-type femoral component of size C, D, and E were 13.1, 7.0, and 6.3 %, respectively (p = 0.004).
Conclusion: The conversion rate from CR- to PS-type prostheses was high in patients with severe flexion contracture, steep posterior slope, and a small femoral component size. These factors should be carefully considered for appropriate selection of prosthesis type.
Level of evidence: IV.
Keywords: Conversion factor; Knee; PCL retaining; PCL substituting; TKA; TKR; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement.
Similar articles
-
Preoperative Factors Predicting the Preservation of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Orthop Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):2203-2209. doi: 10.1111/os.13439. Epub 2022 Aug 17. Orthop Surg. 2022. PMID: 35979544 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison of 2 Tibial Inserts of Different Constraint for Cruciate-Retaining Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Additional Tool for Balancing the Posterior Cruciate Ligament.J Arthroplasty. 2016 Feb;31(2):425-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.032. Epub 2015 Sep 28. J Arthroplasty. 2016. PMID: 26481407
-
What to Know for Selecting Cruciate-Retaining or Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Surg. 2019 Jun;11(2):142-150. doi: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.142. Epub 2019 May 9. Clin Orthop Surg. 2019. PMID: 31156764 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mid-term survivorship of cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using modular mini-keel tibial implants.J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Feb 13;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0738-9. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018. PMID: 29433583 Free PMC article.
-
Posterior-stabilized inserts are preferable to cruciate-substituting ultracongruent inserts due to more favourable kinematics and stability.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Nov;26(11):3300-3310. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4872-z. Epub 2018 Feb 19. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018. PMID: 29459998
Cited by
-
Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts Review.Cureus. 2023 Aug 20;15(8):e43813. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43813. eCollection 2023 Aug. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37746387 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preoperative Factors Predicting the Preservation of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Orthop Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):2203-2209. doi: 10.1111/os.13439. Epub 2022 Aug 17. Orthop Surg. 2022. PMID: 35979544 Free PMC article.
-
An intraoperative load sensor did not improve the early postoperative results of posterior-stabilized TKA for osteoarthritis with varus deformities.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1671-1679. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5314-7. Epub 2018 Dec 3. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019. PMID: 30511096 Clinical Trial.
-
Single-stage total knee arthroplasty and femoral osteotomy for osteoarthritis with severe supracondylar deformity.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Feb 20;16(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02293-w. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 33610184 Free PMC article.
-
Radiological measurement of posterior tibial subluxation as a preoperative factor in choosing the type of implant in primary total knee arthroplasty.Reumatologia. 2024;62(4):235-241. doi: 10.5114/reum/190256. Epub 2024 Jul 2. Reumatologia. 2024. PMID: 39381723 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous