Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Apr;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i98-109.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv125. Epub 2016 Jan 4.

Comparing global alcohol and tobacco control efforts: network formation and evolution in international health governance

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing global alcohol and tobacco control efforts: network formation and evolution in international health governance

Uwe Gneiting et al. Health Policy Plan. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Smoking and drinking constitute two risk factors contributing to the rising burden of non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries. Both issues have gained increased international attention, but tobacco control has made more sustained progress in terms of international and domestic policy commitments, resources dedicated to reducing harm, and reduction of tobacco use in many high-income countries. The research presented here offers insights into why risk factors with comparable levels of harm experience different trajectories of global attention. The analysis focuses particular attention on the role of dedicated global health networks composed of individuals and organizations producing research and engaging in advocacy on a given health problem. Variation in issue characteristics and the policy environment shape the opportunities and challenges of global health networks focused on reducing the burden of disease. What sets the tobacco case apart was the ability of tobacco control advocates to create and maintain a consensus on policy solutions, expand their reach in low- and middle-income countries and combine evidence-based research with advocacy reaching beyond the public health-centered focus of the core network. In contrast, a similar network in the alcohol case struggled with expanding its reach and has yet to overcome divisions based on competing problem definitions and solutions to alcohol harm. The tobacco control network evolved from a group of dedicated individuals to a global coalition of membership-based organizations, whereas the alcohol control network remains at the stage of a collection of dedicated and like-minded individuals.

Keywords: Advocacy; health policy; non-communicable diseases; tobacco and alcohol control..

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Babor T, Hall W, Humphreys K, et al. Who is responsible for the public's health? The role of the alcohol industry in the WHO global strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol. Addiction. 2013;108:2045–7. - PubMed
    1. Beauchamp DE. Beyond Alcoholism. Alcohol and Public Health Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1980.
    1. Bennett A. Process tracing and causal inference. In: Brady HE, Collier D, editors. Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. 2nd. Lanham, MD: Rowman&Littlefield; 2010. pp. 207–220.
    1. Bloomberg Philanthropies. Accelerating the Worldwide Movement to Reduce Tobacco Use. New York: Bloomberg Philanthropies; 2011.
    1. Bond L, Daube M, Chikritzhs T. Access to confidential alcohol industry documents: from ‘Big Tobacco’to ‘Big Booze’. Australasian Medical Journal. 2009;1:1–26.

Publication types