Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 21:9:679.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00679. eCollection 2015.

The Role of Configural Processing in Face Classification by Race: An ERP Study

Affiliations

The Role of Configural Processing in Face Classification by Race: An ERP Study

Jing Lv et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

The current study investigated the time course of the other-race classification advantage (ORCA) in the subordinate classification of normally configured faces and distorted faces by race. Slightly distorting the face configuration delayed the categorization of own-race faces and had no conspicuous effects on other-race faces. The N170 was sensitive neither to configural distortions nor to faces' races. The P3 was enhanced for other-race than own-race faces and reduced by configural manipulation only for own-race faces. We suggest that the source of ORCA is the configural analysis applied by default while processing own-race faces.

Keywords: ERPs; configural processing; face perception; other-race faces.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of the stimuli used in this study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The N170 elicited by own-race and other-race normally configured and faces with slight configural distortions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The P3 elicited by own-race and other-race normally configured and faces with slight configural distortions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The difference waveforms between other-race and own-race faces and between distorted and normal faces as well as the 3D mapping of each component, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., McCarthy G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8, 551–565. 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bentin S., Golland Y., Flevaris A., Robertson L. C., Moscovitch M. (2006). Processing the trees and the forest during initial stages of face perception: electrophysiological evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 1406–1421. 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1406 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bobes M. A., Quinonez I., Perez J., Leon I., Valdes-Sosa M. (2007). Brain potentials reflect access to visual and emotional memories for faces. Biol. Psychol. 75, 146–153. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.01.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caharel S., Montalan B., Fromager E., Bernard C., Lalonde R., Mohamed R. (2011). Other-race and inversion effects during the structural encoding stage of face processing in a race categorization task: an event-related brain potential study. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 79, 266–271. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caldara R., Rossion B., Bovet P., Hauert C. A. (2004). Event-related potentials and time course of the ‘other-race’ face classification advantage. Neuroreport 15, 905–910. 10.1097/00001756-200404090-00034 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources