Structure Modulates Similarity-Based Interference in Sluicing: An Eye Tracking study
- PMID: 26733893
- PMCID: PMC4683205
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01839
Structure Modulates Similarity-Based Interference in Sluicing: An Eye Tracking study
Abstract
In cue-based content-addressable approaches to memory, a target and its competitors are retrieved in parallel from memory via a fast, associative cue-matching procedure under a severely limited focus of attention. Such a parallel matching procedure could in principle ignore the serial order or hierarchical structure characteristic of linguistic relations. I present an eye tracking while reading experiment that investigates whether the sentential position of a potential antecedent modulates the strength of similarity-based interference, a well-studied effect in which increased similarity in features between a target and its competitors results in slower and less accurate retrieval overall. The manipulation trades on an independently established Locality bias in sluiced structures to associate a wh-remnant (which ones) in clausal ellipsis with the most local correlate (some wines), as in The tourists enjoyed some wines, but I don't know which ones. The findings generally support cue-based parsing models of sentence processing that are subject to similarity-based interference in retrieval, and provide additional support to the growing body of evidence that retrieval is sensitive to both the structural position of a target antecedent and its competitors, and the specificity or diagnosticity of retrieval cues.
Keywords: ellipsis; eye tracking; sentence processing; similarity-based interference; working memory.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Retrieval interference in reflexive processing: experimental evidence from Mandarin, and computational modeling.Front Psychol. 2015 May 27;6:617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00617. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26074829 Free PMC article.
-
Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension.Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1859-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.057. Epub 2011 Sep 5. Neuroimage. 2012. PMID: 21925613
-
Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing.J Mem Lang. 2011 May;64(4):327-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.006. J Mem Lang. 2011. PMID: 21580797 Free PMC article.
-
In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):1839-60. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016. PMID: 27098647 Review.
-
Using Self-Generated Cues to Facilitate Recall: A Narrative Review.Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 27;8:1830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01830. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 29163254 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Information Structure Preferences in Focus-Sensitive Ellipsis: How Defaults Persist.Lang Speech. 2018 Sep;61(3):480-512. doi: 10.1177/0023830917737110. Epub 2017 Nov 9. Lang Speech. 2018. PMID: 29119869 Free PMC article.
-
Correlate not optional: PP sprouting and parallelism in "much less" ellipsis.Glossa. 2019;4(1):83. doi: 10.5334/gjgl.707. Epub 2019 Jul 22. Glossa. 2019. PMID: 31360775 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aguilar Guevara A. (2014). Weak Definites. Semantics, Lexicon and Pragmatics. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
-
- Alcocer P., Phillips C. (2012). Using Relational Syntactic Constraints in Content-addressable Memory Architectures for Sentence Parsing. College Park, MD: Ms. University of Maryland.
-
- Anderson J. R. (1974). Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory. Cogn. Psychol. 6, 451–474. 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90021-8 - DOI
-
- Anderson J. R., Reder L. M. (1999). The fan effect: new results and new theories. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 128, 186–197. 10.1037/0096-3445.128.2.186 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources