Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 9;4(1):u207871.w4032.
doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u207871.w4032. eCollection 2015.

Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the 'Sepsis Six' recommendations

Affiliations

Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the 'Sepsis Six' recommendations

Prashant Kumar et al. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. .

Abstract

Sepsis is a common condition with a major global impact on healthcare resources and expenditure. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign has been vigorous in promoting internationally recognised pathways to improve the management of septic patients and decrease mortality. However, translating recommendations into practice is a challenging and complex task that requires a multi-faceted approach with sustained engagement from local stakeholders. Whilst working at a district general hospital in New Zealand, we were concerned by the seemingly inconsistent management of septic patients, often leading to long delays in the initiation of life-saving measures such as antibiotic, fluid, and oxygen administration. In our hospital there were no clear systems, protocols or guidelines in place for identifying and managing septic patients. We therefore launched the Sepsis Six resuscitation bundle of care in our hospital in an attempt to raise awareness amongst staff and improve the management of septic patients. We introduced a number of simple low-cost interventions that included educational sessions for junior doctors and nursing staff, as well as posters and modifications to phlebotomy trolleys that acted as visual reminders to implement the Sepsis Six bundle. Overall, we found there to a be a steady improvement in the delivery of the Sepsis Six bundle in septic patients with 63% of patients receiving appropriate care within one hour, compared to 29% prior to our interventions. However this did not translate to an improvement in patient mortality. This project forms part of an on going process to instigate a fundamental culture change among local healthcare professionals regarding the management of sepsis. Whilst we have demonstrated improved implementation of the Sepsis Six bundle, the key challenge remains to ensure that momentum of this project continues and forms a platform for sustainable clinical improvement in the long term.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al. . Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013;41(2):580–637 - PubMed
    1. Daniels R. Surviving the first hours in sepsis: getting the basics right (an intensivist's perspective). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(suppl 2):ii11–23 - PubMed
    1. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S et al. . Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368–77. - PubMed
    1. Baxter S, Hutchings S, & Barnes T. Timeliness of antibiotic administration in septic shock. In: Colvin JR, & Pedan CJ [3rd ed.] Raising the standard: a compendium of audit recipes for continuous quality improvement in anaesthesia. London: Royal College of anaesthetists; 2012. Available from www.rcoa.ac.uk/system/files/CSQ-ARB2012-PRELIM.pdf
    1. Robson WP, & Daniels R. The Sepsis Six: helping patients to survive sepsis. Br J Nurs 2008;17:16–21 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources