Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun;72(6):1221-35.
doi: 10.1111/jan.12890. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

Integrative review: postcraniotomy pain in the brain tumour patient

Rebecca Elizabeth Guilkey  1 , Diane Von Ah  1 , Janet S Carpenter  1 , Cynthia Stone  2 , Claire B Draucker  1
Affiliations
Review

Integrative review: postcraniotomy pain in the brain tumour patient

Rebecca Elizabeth Guilkey et al. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: To conduct an integrative review to examine evidence of pain and associated symptoms in adult (≥21 years of age), postcraniotomy, brain tumour patients hospitalized on intensive care units.

Background: Healthcare providers believe craniotomies are less painful than other surgical procedures. Understanding how postcraniotomy pain unfolds over time will help inform patient care and aid in future research and policy development.

Design: Systematic literature search to identify relevant literature. Information abstracted using the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms' concepts of influencing factors, symptom clusters and patient performance. Inclusion criteria were indexed, peer-reviewed, full-length, English-language articles. Keywords were 'traumatic brain injury', 'pain, post-operative', 'brain injuries', 'postoperative pain', 'craniotomy', 'decompressive craniectomy' and 'trephining'.

Data sources: Medline, OVID, PubMed and CINAHL databases from 2000-2014.

Review method: Cooper's five-stage integrative review method was used to assess and synthesize literature.

Results: The search yielded 115 manuscripts, with 26 meeting inclusion criteria. Most studies were randomized, controlled trials conducted outside of the United States. All tested pharmacological pain interventions. Postcraniotomy brain tumour pain was well-documented and associated with nausea, vomiting and changes in blood pressure, and it impacted the patient's length of hospital stay, but there was no consensus for how best to treat such pain.

Conclusion: The Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms provided structure to the search. Postcraniotomy pain is experienced by patients, but associated symptoms and impact on patient performance remain poorly understood. Further research is needed to improve understanding and management of postcraniotomy pain in this population.

Keywords: brain tumour; craniotomy; integrative review; literature review; nurses; nursing; pain; theory of unpleasant symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors had no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Diagram of Systematic Search
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. American Brain Tumor Association. Surgery. Chicago: American Brain Tumor Association; 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.abta.org/secure/surgery.pdf.
    1. Andrasik F, Buse D, Lettich A. Assessment of headaches. In: Turk D, Melzack R, editors. Handbook of Pain Assessment. Third. New York: The Guilford Press; 2011.
    1. Bala I, Gupta B, Bhardwaj N, Ghai B, Khosla VK. Effect of scalp block on postoperative pain relief in craniotomy patients. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2006;34(2):224–227. - PubMed
    1. Batoz H, Verdonck O, Pellerin C, Roux G, Maurette P. ‘The analgesic properties of scalp infiltrations with ropivacaine after intracranial tumor resection’. Anesthesia Analgesia. 2009;109:240–244. - PubMed
    1. Biswas BK, Bithal PK. Preincision 0.25% bupivicaine scalp infiltration and postcraniotomy pain: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. 2003;15(3):234–239. - PubMed