Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 6;11(1):e0145232.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145232. eCollection 2016.

Using Species Distribution Models to Predict Potential Landscape Restoration Effects on Puma Conservation

Affiliations

Using Species Distribution Models to Predict Potential Landscape Restoration Effects on Puma Conservation

Cintia Camila Silva Angelieri et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

A mosaic of intact native and human-modified vegetation use can provide important habitat for top predators such as the puma (Puma concolor), avoiding negative effects on other species and ecological processes due to cascade trophic interactions. This study investigates the effects of restoration scenarios on the puma's habitat suitability in the most developed Brazilian region (São Paulo State). Species Distribution Models incorporating restoration scenarios were developed using the species' occurrence information to (1) map habitat suitability of pumas in São Paulo State, Southeast, Brazil; (2) test the relative contribution of environmental variables ecologically relevant to the species habitat suitability and (3) project the predicted habitat suitability to future native vegetation restoration scenarios. The Maximum Entropy algorithm was used (Test AUC of 0.84 ± 0.0228) based on seven environmental non-correlated variables and non-autocorrelated presence-only records (n = 342). The percentage of native vegetation (positive influence), elevation (positive influence) and density of roads (negative influence) were considered the most important environmental variables to the model. Model projections to restoration scenarios reflected the high positive relationship between pumas and native vegetation. These projections identified new high suitability areas for pumas (probability of presence >0.5) in highly deforested regions. High suitability areas were increased from 5.3% to 8.5% of the total State extension when the landscapes were restored for ≥ the minimum native vegetation cover rule (20%) established by the Brazilian Forest Code in private lands. This study highlights the importance of a landscape planning approach to improve the conservation outlook for pumas and other species, including not only the establishment and management of protected areas, but also the habitat restoration on private lands. Importantly, the results may inform environmental policies and land use planning in São Paulo State, Brazil.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study area map.
Land use and pumas’ occurrence records (2001–2012) in São Paulo State, Southeast, Brazil. This figure was elaborated by the first author using software ArcGIS 10.1 and IrfanView 4.37.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The puma habitat suitability in São Paulo State, Brazil and its projection in three restoration scenarios: (a) original Maxent distribution model average, (b) ≥10% percentage of native vegetation restoration scenario, (c) ≥20% percentage of native vegetation restoration scenario, and ≥30% percentage of native vegetation restoration scenario (d).
This figure was elaborated by the first author using softwares ArcGIS 10.1 and IrfanView 4.37.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Marginal response curves showing how the logistic prediction changed as each of the three environmental variables that contributed the most to the models were varied: native vegetation (a), elevation (b) and density of roads (c).
Fig 4
Fig 4. High probability of puma presence (original) in São Paulo State, Brazil and high probability of puma presence projected in three restoration scenarios (≥10% percentage of native vegetation, ≥20% percentage of native vegetation, and ≥30% percentage of native vegetation) zoomed in for a close-up of three different landscape regions: (a) Northwestern region, (b) Central region and (c) Southeastern region.
This figure was elaborated by the first author using softwares ArcGIS 10.1 and IrfanView 4.37.

References

    1. McKee JK, Sciulli PW, Fooce CD, Waite TA (2003) Forecasting global biodiversity threats associated with human population growth. Biological Conservation 115: 161–164.
    1. Chazdon RL, Harvey CA, Komar O, Griffith DM, Ferguson BG, Martínez-Ramos M et al. (2009) Beyond Reserves: A Research Agenda for Conserving Biodiversity in Human-modified Tropical Landscapes. Biotropica 41: 142–153.
    1. Bennett AF, Radford JQ, Haslem A (2006) Properties of land mosaics: implications for nature conservation in agricultural environments. Biological Conservation 133: 250–264.
    1. Vandermeer J, Perfecto I (2007) The agricultural matrix and a future paradigm for conservation. Conservation Biology 21: 274–277. - PubMed
    1. Cardillo M, Purvis A, Bielby J, Mace GM, Sechrest W, Gittleman JL (2004) Human population density and extinction risk in the world’s carnivorous. PLoS Biology 2: 909–914. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources