Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;34(5):435-46.
doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0370-z.

Value-Based Assessment of New Medical Technologies: Towards a Robust Methodological Framework for the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in the Context of Health Technology Assessment

Affiliations

Value-Based Assessment of New Medical Technologies: Towards a Robust Methodological Framework for the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in the Context of Health Technology Assessment

Aris Angelis et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 May.

Abstract

In recent years, multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has emerged as a likely alternative to address shortcomings in health technology assessment (HTA) by offering a more holistic perspective to value assessment and acting as an alternative priority setting tool. In this paper, we argue that MCDA needs to subscribe to robust methodological processes related to the selection of objectives, criteria and attributes in order to be meaningful in the context of healthcare decision making and fulfil its role in value-based assessment (VBA). We propose a methodological process, based on multi-attribute value theory (MAVT) methods comprising five distinct phases, outline the stages involved in each phase and discuss their relevance in the HTA process. Importantly, criteria and attributes need to satisfy a set of desired properties, otherwise the outcome of the analysis can produce spurious results and misleading recommendations. Assuming the methodological process we propose is adhered to, the application of MCDA presents three very distinct advantages to decision makers in the context of HTA and VBA: first, it acts as an instrument for eliciting preferences on the performance of alternative options across a wider set of explicit criteria, leading to a more complete assessment of value; second, it allows the elicitation of preferences across the criteria themselves to reflect differences in their relative importance; and, third, the entire process of preference elicitation can be informed by direct stakeholder engagement, and can therefore reflect their own preferences. All features are fully transparent and facilitate decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Value function for scoring the performance of alternative options
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methodological process in the context of health technology assessment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Value tree hierarchies and data sources using a multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for value assessment

References

    1. Dolan P. The measurement of health-related quality of life for use in resource allocation decisions in health care. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, editors. Handbook of health economics. Amsterdam: North Holland; 2000.
    1. Drummond M. Basic types of economic evaluation. In: Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al, editors. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press; 2005.
    1. Drummond M, Brixner D, Gold M, et al. Toward a consensus on the QALY. Value Health. 2009;12(Suppl 1):S31–S35. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00522.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weinstein MC, Stason WB. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. N Engl J Med. 1977;296:716–721. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197703312961304. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kahneman D. New challenges to the rationality assumption. Leg Theory. 1997;3:105–124. doi: 10.1017/S1352325200000689. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources