Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;9(3):290-311.
doi: 10.1075/gest.9.3.02ali.

Gesture-speech integration in narrative: Are children less redundant than adults?

Martha W Alibali  1 , Julia L Evans  2 , Autumn B Hostetter  3 , Kristin Ryan  1 , Elina Mainela-Arnold  4
Affiliations

Gesture-speech integration in narrative: Are children less redundant than adults?

Martha W Alibali et al. Gesture (Amst). 2009.

Abstract

Speakers sometimes express information in gestures that they do not express in speech. In this research, we developed a system that could be used to assess the redundancy of gesture and speech in a narrative task. We then applied this system to examine whether children and adults produce non-redundant gesture-speech combinations at similar rates. The coding system was developed based on a sample of 30 children. A crucial feature of the system is that gesture meanings can be assessed based on form alone; thus, the meanings speakers express in gesture and speech can be assessed independently and compared. We then collected narrative data from a new sample of 17 children (ages 5-10), as well as a sample of 20 adults, and we determined the average proportion of non-redundant gesture-speech combinations produced by individuals in each group. Children produced more non-redundant gesture-speech combinations than adults, both at the clause level and at the word level. These findings suggest that gesture-speech integration is not constant over the life span, but instead appears to change with development.

Keywords: development; gesture; gesture–speech integration; narrative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rate of gestures per 100 words for children and adults. The error bars represent standard errors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of gestures with codable meanings with each type of gesture–speech relationship. The error bars represent standard errors.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alibali Martha W., Bassok Miriam, Solomon Karen O., Syc Sharon E., Goldin-Meadow Susan. Illuminating mental representations through speech and gesture. Psychological Science. 1999;10:327–333.
    1. Alibali Martha W., Don Lisa S. Children’s gestures are meant to be seen. Gesture. 2001;1:113–127.
    1. Alibali Martha W., Goldin-Meadow Susan. Transitions in learning: what the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology. 1993;25:468–523. - PubMed
    1. Alibali Martha W., Kita Sotaro, Young Amanda. Gesture and the process of speech production: we think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2000;15:593–613.
    1. Beattie Geoffrey, Shovelton Heather. Do iconic hand gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech? An experimental investigation. Semiotica. 1999a;123(1/2):1–30.

LinkOut - more resources