Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):454-74.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12436. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

Green House Adoption and Nursing Home Quality

Collaborators, Affiliations

Green House Adoption and Nursing Home Quality

Christopher C Afendulis et al. Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the Green House (GH) model on nursing home resident-level quality of care measures.

Data sources/study setting: Resident-level minimum data set (MDS) assessments merged with Medicare inpatient claims for the period 2005 through 2010.

Study design: Using a difference-in-differences framework, we compared changes in care quality and outcomes in 15 nursing homes that adopted the GH model relative to changes over the same time period in 223 matched nursing homes that had not adopted the GH model.

Principal findings: For individuals residing in GH homes, adoption of the model lowered readmissions and several MDS measures of poor quality, including bedfast residents, catheter use, and pressure ulcers, but these results were not present across the entire GH organization, suggesting possible offsetting effects for residents of non-GH "legacy" units within the GH organization.

Conclusions: GH adoption led to improvement in rehospitalizations and certain nursing home quality measures for individuals residing in a GH home. The absence of evidence of a decline in other clinical quality measures in GH nursing homes should reassure anyone concerned that GH might have sacrificed clinical quality for improved quality of life.

Keywords: Green House nursing home; Nursing homes; culture change; quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson, M. L. 2008. “Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 103 (484): 481–1495.
    1. Bowers, B. , Nolet K., and Jacobson N., for the THRIVE Research Collaborative . 2016. “Sustaining Culture Change: Experiences in the Green House Model.” Health Services Research 51 (1 Pt 2): 398–417. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowers, B. , Roberts T., Nolet K., and Ryther B., for the THRIVE Research Collaborative . 2016. “Inside the Green House “Black Box”: Opportunities for High Quality Clinical Decision Making.” Health Services Research 51 (1 Pt 2): 378–397. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carlson, B. L. , Foster L., Dale S. B., and Brown R.. 2007. “Effects of Cash and Counseling on Personal Care and Well‐Being.” Health Services Research 42 (1 Pt 2): 467–87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen, L. W. , Zimmerman S., Reed D., Brown P., Bowers B. J., Nolet K., Hudak S., and Horn S. D. for the THRIVE Research Collaborative . 2016. “The Green House Model of Nursing Home Care in Design and Implementation.” Health Services Research 51 (1 Pt 2): 352–77. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types