Clinical and radiological analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up results compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
- PMID: 26744166
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-3098-7
Clinical and radiological analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up results compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
Abstract
Purpose: Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty has been reported with satisfactory short- and medium-term clinical results. However, the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes are seldom reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the eight-year follow-up results in patients who underwent Bryan disc arthroplasty with patients received ACDF, and assess the incidence of heterotopic ossification (HO) and its effect on clinical outcome and mobility of the device.
Methods: Thirty-one patients underwent Bryan disc arthroplasty, and 35 patients underwent ACDF were included in the study. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, neck disability index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) of neck and arm pain, and the radiographs were used to evaluate the outcomes. The heterotopic ossification (HO) was determined by CT scan and was classified into three subgroups to compare the related effect. Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) was also observed.
Results: At final follow-up, there were no significant differences in JOA scores between two groups, but the improvement in NDI and neck or arm VAS were significantly greater in the Bryan disc cohort. The range of motion at the index level was 7.0° in Bryan group, while 100 % bone fusion were achieved in ACDF group. HO was observed in 18 (51.4 %) levels. There were more restricted movement of the prosthesis and slight higher rate of axial pain in patients with severe-HO (grade III and IV). Fourteen (28.6 %) levels developed ASD in Bryan group, which was significantly lower than that (58.6 %) in ACDF group.
Conclusions: At eight year follow-up, the clinical and radiographic outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty compared favorably to those of ACDF. It avoided accelerated adjacent segment degeneration by preserving motion. However, severe HO restricted the ROM of the index levels and maybe associated with post-operative axial pain.
Keywords: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Bryan disc; Cervical arthroplasty; Clinical outcome; Heterotopic ossification; Movement.
Similar articles
-
Clinical and radiographic comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP Disc and anterior cervical fusion: A minimum 6-year follow-up study.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;164:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 5. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 29216503
-
Clinical and Radiologic Features of 3 Reconstructive Procedures for the Surgical Management of Patients with Bilevel Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease at a Minimum Follow-Up Period of 5 Years: A Comparative Study.World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:e70-e76. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.157. Epub 2018 Jan 31. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 29408574
-
Heterotopic ossification following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results from the prospective, multicenter, historically controlled trial comparing allograft to an optimized dose of rhBMP-2.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Sep;25(3):292-302. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.SPINE15798. Epub 2016 Apr 29. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 27129045 Clinical Trial.
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5. Epub 2016 Jun 17. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 27314663 Review.
-
Effect of device constraint: a comparative network meta-analysis of ACDF and cervical disc arthroplasty.Spine J. 2024 Oct;24(10):1858-1871. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.016. Epub 2024 Jun 4. Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38843960
Cited by
-
Effect of facet joint distraction on the functional and radiological outcomes after anterior cervical disc replacement.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 3;23(1):741. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05705-y. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022. PMID: 35922787 Free PMC article.
-
The Changes in Cervical Biomechanics After CTDR and Its Association With Heterotopic Ossification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Global Spine J. 2021 May;11(4):565-574. doi: 10.1177/2192568220922949. Epub 2020 Jun 3. Global Spine J. 2021. PMID: 32677512 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(27):e4171. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004171. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. PMID: 27399140 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP Disc: a minimum 6-year follow-up study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Aug 7;19(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2201-9. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018. PMID: 30086733 Free PMC article.
-
[Impact of anterior cervical fusion surgeries on adjacent segments: a finite element analysis].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2017 Jan 20;37(1):49-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.01.09. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2017. PMID: 28109098 Free PMC article. Chinese.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical