Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;7(1):68-74.
doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1127463.

Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies

Affiliations

Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies

Randi Lundberg et al. Gut Microbes. 2016.

Erratum in

  • doi: 10.1038/srep05922

Abstract

We recently investigated the applicability of antibiotic-treated recipient mice for transfer of different gut microbiota profiles. With this addendum we elaborate on perspectives and limitations of using antibiotics as an alternative to germ-free (GF) technology in microbial transplantation studies, and we speculate on the housing effect. It is possible to transfer host phenotypes via fecal transplantation to antibiotic-treated animals, but problems with reproducibility, baseline values, and antibiotic resistance genes should be considered. GF animals maintained in isolators still seem to be the best controlled models for long-term microbial transplantation, but antibiotic-treated recipients are also commonly utilized. We identify a need for systematic experiments investigating the stability of microbial transplantations by addressing 1) the recipient status as either GF, antibiotic-treated or specific pathogen free and 2) different levels of protected housing systems. In addition, the developmental effect of microbes on host physiological functions should be evaluated in the different scenarios.

Keywords: animal models; antibiotics; fecal transplantation; germ-free; gut microbiota; mouse; reproducibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kirk RG. “Life in a germ-free world:” isolating life from the laboratory animal to the bubble boy. Bull Hist Med 2012; 86:237-75; PMID:23000838; http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2012.0028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hansen AK, Nielsen DS. Handbook of Laboratory Animal Bacteriology, Second Edition - CRC Press Book. 2nd ed. CRC Press; 2014
    1. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 2006; 444:1027-31; PMID:17183312; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05414 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bercik P, Denou E, Collins J, Jackson W, Lu J, Jury J, Deng Y, Blennerhassett P, Macri J, McCoy KD, et al.. The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. Gastroenterology 2011; 141:599-609, 609.e1-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.052 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wen L, Ley RE, Volchkov PY, Stranges PB, Avanesyan L, Stonebraker AC, Hu C, Wong FS, Szot GL, Bluestone JA, et al.. Innate immunity and intestinal microbiota in the development of Type 1 diabetes. Nature 2008; 455:1109-13; PMID:18806780; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07336 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources