Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 2;11(1):1-12.
doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1131388. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

In vitro formation of neuroclusters in microfluidic devices and cell migration as a function of stromal-derived growth factor 1 gradients

Sean McCutcheon  1 , Uchenna Unachukwu  2 , Ankush Thakur  1 , Robert Majeska  1 , Stephen Redenti  2 , Maribel Vazquez  1
Affiliations

In vitro formation of neuroclusters in microfluidic devices and cell migration as a function of stromal-derived growth factor 1 gradients

Sean McCutcheon et al. Cell Adh Migr. .

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) cells cultured in vitro as neuroclusters are useful models of tissue regeneration and disease progression. However, the role of cluster formation and collective migration of these neuroclusters to external stimuli has been largely unstudied in vitro. Here, 3 distinct CNS cell types, medulloblastoma (MB), medulloblastoma-derived glial progenitor cells (MGPC), and retinal progenitor cells (RPC), were examined with respect to cluster formation and migration in response to Stromal-Derived Growth Factor (SDF-1). A microfluidic platform was used to distinguish collective migration of neuroclusters from that of individual cells in response to controlled concentration profiles of SDF-1. Cell lines were also compared with respect to expression of CXCR4, the receptor for SDF-1, and the gap junction protein Connexin 43 (Cx43). All cell types spontaneously formed clusters and expressed both CXCR4 and Cx43. RPC clusters exhibited collective chemotactic migration (i.e. movement as clusters) along SDF-1 concentration gradients. MGPCs clusters did not exhibit adhesion-based migration, and migration of MB clusters was inconsistent. This study demonstrates how controlled microenvironments can be used to examine the formation and collective migration of CNS-derived neuroclusters in varied cell populations.

Keywords: SDF-1; central nervous system; chemotaxis; collective migration; medulloblastoma; retinal progenitors; stromal-derived growth factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
µLane microchannel device to measure chemotactic cell migration. (A) Device schematic. (B) Gradient profile based on measurements of fluorescent dextran (MW = 10kDa) at steady-state, t = 18 hours. Position x =0 is assigned to the sink well.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cell cluster formation 48 h after plating. Suspensions of MGPCs (Row A) RPCs (Row B), and MB (Row C) at 104 cells/mL (Col 1), 105 cells/mL (Col 2), and 106 cells/mL (Col 3) were plated and photographed at 48 h. Representative single cells and clusters (arrows) are shown for each cell type.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Changes in cluster number and size with time in culture. Cluster number (Column 1) and size by area (Column 2) are shown for suspensions of MGPCs (Row A), RPCs (Row B) and MB (Row C) at cell densities indicated in each panel. Data show mean and standard deviation, n > 4 wells.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Chemotactic migration to SDF-1 assessed by transwell assay. Average number of cells migrated through an 8μm porous membrane toward 100 ng/mL SDF-1. Data show total migrated cell count, n > 3 wells.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Cells in the µLane microfluidic device. Images of MGPC in µLane device 124, (A2) 105, (A3) 106 cells/mL seeding density. Likewise for RPCs (B1–3) and MB (C1–3). Representative clusters demarcated by arrows.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Spatial plots of single cell and neurocluster trajectory. Representative and mean trajectories for both single cells (Column 1) and clusters (Column 2) along with length of center of mass (Lc) distribution for clusters vs single cells (Column 3) over 24 hr toward an increasing (0–100 ng/mL) SDF-1 gradient in RPCs (Row A) and MB (Row B). Positive y-axis indicates direction of increasing SDF-1 concentration.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Immunocytochemistry of CXCR4 expression. ICC images of CXCR4 staining at 104 (Column 1), 105 (Column 2), and 106 cell/mL (Column 3) stimulated with 100 ng/mL SDF-1 and comparison of relative fluorescence intensity to unstimulated control (Column 4) for MGPCs (Row A), RPCs (Row B) and MB (Row C). Green staining denotes CXCR4 for MGPCs. Red staining denotes Connexin 43 for RPCs and MB. Blue staining denotes cell nuclei. All scale bars 50 µm. *statistical significance (p<0.05).
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Immunocytochemistry of Connexin 43 expression. ICC images of Cx43 staining for both single cells (Column 1) and clusters (Column 2) stimulated with 100 ng/mL SDF-1 and comparison of relative fluorescence intensity to unstimulated control (Column 3) for MGPCs (Row A), RPCs (Row B) and MB (Row C). Green staining denotes Connexin 43 for MGPCs. Red staining denotes Connexin 43 for RPCs and MB. Blue staining denotes cell nuclei. All scale bars 50 µm. Statistical significance (p<0.05)** or (p<0.1)* between respective single cell or cluster SDF- and SDF+ groups.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Askenasy N, Zorina T, Farkas DL, Shalit I. Transplanted hematopoietic cells seed in clusters in recipient bone marrow in vivo. Stem Cells 2002; 20(4):301-10; PMID:12110699; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1634/stemcells.20-4-301 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedl P, Gilmour D. Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:445-4; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm2720 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aceto N, Bardia A, Miyamoto DT, Donaldson MC, Wittner BS, Spencer JA, Yu M, Pely A, Engstrom A, Zhu H et al.. Circulating tumor cell clusters are oligoclonal precursors of breast cancer metastasis. Cell 2014; 158(5):1110-22; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilbert SF. Developmental Biology. 6th edition Sunderland (MA: ): Sinauer Associates; 2000
    1. Galanternik MV, Kramer KL, Piotrowski T. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans regulate Fgf signaling and cell polarity during collective cell migration. Cell Rep 2015. 10, Issue 3, p414-428; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.043 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources