Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;27(3):395-404.
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000437.

Risk of Cardiovascular Disease from Cumulative Cigarette Use and the Impact of Smoking Intensity

Affiliations

Risk of Cardiovascular Disease from Cumulative Cigarette Use and the Impact of Smoking Intensity

Jay H Lubin et al. Epidemiology. 2016 May.

Abstract

Background: Relative risks (RRs) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) by smoking rate exhibit a concave pattern, with RRs in low rate smokers exceeding a linear extrapolation from higher rate smokers. However, cigarettes/day does not by itself fully characterize smoking-related risks. A reexamination of the concave pattern using a comprehensive representation of smoking may enhance insights.

Methods: Data were from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, a prospective cohort enrolled in four areas of the US in 1987-1989. Follow-up was through 2008. Analyses included 14,233 participants, 245,915 person-years, and 3,411 CVD events.

Results: The concave RRs with cigarettes/day were consistent with cigarettes/day modifying a linear RR association of pack-years with CVD (i.e., strength of the pack-years association depended on cigarettes/day, indicating that the manner of pack-years accrual impacted risk). Smoking fewer cigarettes/day for longer duration was more deleterious than smoking more cigarettes/day for shorter duration (P < 0.01). For 50 pack-years (365,000 cigarettes), estimated RRs of CVD were 2.1 for accrual at 20 cigarettes/day and 1.6 for accrual at 50 cigarettes/day. Years since smoking cessation did not alter the diminishing strength of association with increasing cigarettes/day. Analyses that accounted for competing risks did not affect findings.

Conclusion: Pack-years remained the primary determinant of smoking-related CVD risk; however, accrual influenced RRs. For equal pack-years, smoking fewer cigarettes/day for longer duration was more deleterious than smoking more cigarettes/day for shorter duration. This observation provides clues to better understanding the biological mechanisms, and reinforces the importance of cessation rather than smoking less to reduce CVD risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative risks of cardiovascular disease for categories of pack-years of cigarette smoking (solid symbol) relative to never-smokers for all data and within categories of cigarettes/day (CPD) and fitted models, including: linear (solid line), linear-exponential (dash line) and linear adjusted for ever-smoked cigarettes (dot line). All results adjusted for age, birth year, sex and other factors (see text).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated excess relative risk/pack-year (ERR/PKY) for cardiovascular disease within categories of cigarettes/day (solid symbol), with the lowest category further divided into 1–4 and 5–9 cigarettes/day (open symbol), and fitted models for continuous pack-years and cigarettes/day. All results adjusted for age, birth year, sex and other factors (see text).
Figure 3
Figure 3
For coronary heart disease (left panels) and stroke (right panels), relative risks for categories of pack-years of cigarette smoking (solid symbol) relative to never-smokers with fitted linear (solid line) and linear-exponential (dash line) model (upper panels) and estimated excess relative risk/pack-year within categories of cigarettes/day (solid symbol) and fitted models for continuous pack-years and cigarettes/day (solid line) (lower panels). All results adjusted for age, birth year, sex and other factors (see text).
Figure 4
Figure 4
For years since cessation of smoking, relative risks for cardiovascular disease by categories of pack-years of cigarette smoking (solid symbol) relative to never-smokers with fitted linear (solid line) and linear-exponential (dash line) models (left panels) and estimated excess relative risk/pack-year within categories of cigarettes/day (solid symbol) and fitted models for continuous pack-years and cigarettes/day (solid line) (right panels). All results adjusted for age, birth year, sex and other factors (see text).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Benowitz NL. Cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: Pathophysiology and implications for treatment. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2003;46(1):91–111. - PubMed
    1. Burns DM. Epidemiology of smoking-induced cardiovascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2003;46(1):11–29. - PubMed
    1. Law MR, Wald NJ. Environmental tobacco smoke and ischemic heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2003;46(1):31–38. - PubMed
    1. Benowitz NL, Pomerleau OF, Pomerleau CS, Jacob P. Nicotine metabolite ratio as a predictor of cigarette consumption. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003;5(5):621–624. - PubMed
    1. Csordas A, Bernhard D. The biology behind the atherothrombotic effects of cigarette smoke. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013;10(4):219–230. - PubMed

Publication types