Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Jul;42(4):952-62.
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv225. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

Acceptance and Efficacy of Metacognitive Training (MCT) on Positive Symptoms and Delusions in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis Taking Into Account Important Moderators

Carolin Eichner  1 , Fabrice Berna  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Acceptance and Efficacy of Metacognitive Training (MCT) on Positive Symptoms and Delusions in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis Taking Into Account Important Moderators

Carolin Eichner et al. Schizophr Bull. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Metacognitive training (MCT) is a new, widely used intervention for psychosis. The present meta-analysis examines the efficacy of MCT in schizophrenia. Fifteen studies comparing effects of MCT on positive symptoms, delusions or acceptance of MCT with a control group were included in this meta-analysis. These studies comprised a total of 408 patients in the MCT condition and 399 in the control condition. The moderating effects of masking of outcome assessment, randomization, incomplete outcome data, use of an active control intervention, and individual vs group MCT were investigated. Possible effects of sensitivity analyses and publication bias were also examined. The results show a significant overall effect of MCT for positive symptoms (g = -0.34, 95% CI [-0.53, -0.15]), delusions (g = -0.41, 95% CI [-0.74, -0.07]) and acceptance of the intervention (g = -0.84, 95% CI [-1.37, -0.31]). Using only studies being at low risk for bias regarding randomization, masking and incomplete outcome data reduced effect sizes for positive symptoms and delusions (g = -0.28, 95% CI [-0.50, -0.06] and g = -0.18, 95% CI [-0.43, 0.06]), respectively. This meta-analysis demonstrates that MCT exerts a small to moderate effect on delusions and positive symptoms and a large effect on acceptance of the intervention. The effect on delusions is reduced, but remains significant when potential biases are considered.

Keywords: acceptance; cognitive bias; delusions; metacognitive training; psychosis; rehabilitation; schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flow chart of study selection. Adapted from, Moher et al. n = number of studies.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Forest plot of studies in the meta-analysis of positive symptoms. Effect sizes of metacognitive training (MCT) on positive symptoms.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Forest plot of studies in the meta-analysis of delusions. Effect sizes of metacognitive training (MCT) on delusions.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Forest plot of studies in the meta-analysis of acceptance of the intervention. Effect sizes of acceptance of the intervention.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Freeman D, Garety P. Advances in understanding and treating persecutory delusions: a review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014;49:1179–1189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell V, Halligan PW, Ellis HD. Explaining delusions: a cognitive perspective. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006;10:219–226. - PubMed
    1. Van der Gaag M. A neuropsychiatric model of biological and psychological processes in the remission of delusions and auditory hallucinations. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32:S113–S122. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freeman D. Suspicious minds: the psychology of persecutory delusions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27:425–457. - PubMed
    1. Fine C, Gardner M, Craigie J, Gold I. Hopping, skipping or jumping to conclusions? Clarifying the role of the JTC bias in delusions. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2007;12:46–77. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms