Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) for Interventional Pain Management Practices: Challenges and Opportunities
- PMID: 26752483
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) for Interventional Pain Management Practices: Challenges and Opportunities
Abstract
Basing their rationale on multiple publications from Institute of Medicine (IOM), specifically Crossing the Quality Chasm, policy makers have focused on a broad range of issues, including assessment of the influence of medical practice organization structures on quality performance and development of quality measures. The 2006 Tax Relief and Health Care Act established the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), to enable eligible professionals to report health care quality and health outcome information that cannot be obtained from standard Medicare claims. However, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 required the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to incorporate a combination of cost and quality into the payment systems for health care as a precursor to value-based payments. The final change to PQRS pending initiation after 2018, is based on the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) which has incorporated alternative payment models and merit-based payment systems. Recent publication of quality performance scores by CMS has been less than optimal. When voluntary participation began in July 2007, providers were paid a bonus for reporting quality measures from 2008 through 2014, ranging from 0.5% to 2% of the Medicare Part B allowed charges furnished during the reporting period. Starting in 2015, penalties started for nonparticipation. Eligible professionals and group practices that failed to satisfactorily report data on quality measures during 2014 are subject to a 2% reduction in Medicare fee-for-service amounts for services furnished by the eligible professional or group practice during 2016. The CMS proposed rule for 2016 physician payments contained a number of provisions with proposed updates to the PQRS and Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier among other changes. The proposed rule is the first release since MACRA repealed the sustainable growth rate formula. CMS proposed to continue many existing policies regarding PQRS from 2015 to 2016. In addition, 2016 will be the year that is utilized to determine the 2018 PQRS payment adjustment. However, after 2018 the PQRS payment adjustment will be transitioned to the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), as required by MACRA. Overall, there will be over 280 measures in the 2016 PQRS.Readers might be surprised to find out that despite the cost intensity including time requirements personnel, the negative payment adjustments, are only the tip of the iceberg of cost. Indeed, all of the above may only be one-third or one-fourth of the cost to completely implement the PQRS system. Thus far, data across all specialties shows participation to be around 50%. In addition, penalties for lack of reporting of PQRS measures stands to be controversial to the Supreme Court ruling that unfunded mandates must not be permitted and also lack of significant relationships with improvement in quality in the overall analysis in multiple publications.
Similar articles
-
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: Meaningful Changes in the Final Rule Brings Cautious Optimism.Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E1-E12. Pain Physician. 2017. PMID: 28072793
-
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Harsh Choices For Interventional Pain Management Physicians.Pain Physician. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(7):E917-34. Pain Physician. 2016. PMID: 27676686
-
Physician payment outlook for 2012: déjà vu.Pain Physician. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):E27-52. Pain Physician. 2012. PMID: 22270747
-
Reframing Medicare Physician Payment Policy for 2019: A Look at Proposed Policy.Pain Physician. 2018 Sep;21(5):415-432. Pain Physician. 2018. PMID: 30282387 Review.
-
MACRA 2.0: are you ready for MIPS?J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Jul;9(7):714-716. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012845. Epub 2016 Nov 24. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017. PMID: 27884928 Review.
Cited by
-
Utilization Patterns of Facet Joint Interventions in Managing Spinal Pain: a Retrospective Cohort Study in the US Fee-for-Service Medicare Population.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Aug 6;23(10):73. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0816-7. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019. PMID: 31388874 Review.
-
Therapeutic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in the treatment of chronic low back pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomized controlled trial.Korean J Pain. 2018 Jan;31(1):27-38. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2018.31.1.27. Epub 2018 Jan 2. Korean J Pain. 2018. PMID: 29372023 Free PMC article.
-
The Qualified Clinical Data Registry: A Pathway to Success within MACRA.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jul;38(7):1292-1296. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5220. Epub 2017 May 18. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017. PMID: 28522660 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cost Utility Analysis of Cervical Therapeutic Medial Branch Blocks in Managing Chronic Neck Pain.Int J Med Sci. 2017 Oct 15;14(13):1307-1316. doi: 10.7150/ijms.20755. eCollection 2017. Int J Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 29200944 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Need for Comprehensive Health Care Quality Measures for Older Adults.Popul Health Manag. 2018 Aug;21(4):296-302. doi: 10.1089/pop.2017.0109. Epub 2017 Oct 24. Popul Health Manag. 2018. PMID: 29064345 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical