SaFaRI: sacral nerve stimulation versus the FENIX magnetic sphincter augmentation for adult faecal incontinence: a randomised investigation
- PMID: 26754071
- PMCID: PMC4744248
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2492-3
SaFaRI: sacral nerve stimulation versus the FENIX magnetic sphincter augmentation for adult faecal incontinence: a randomised investigation
Abstract
Purpose: Faecal incontinence is a physically, psychologically and socially disabling condition. NICE guidance (2007) recommends surgical intervention, including sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), after failed conservative therapies. The FENIX magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) device is a novel continence device consisting of a flexible band of interlinked titanium beads with magnetic cores that is placed around the anal canal to augment anal sphincter tone through passive attraction of the beads. Preliminary studies suggest the FENIX MSA is safe, but efficacy data is limited. Rigorous evaluation is required prior to widespread adoption.
Method and design: The SaFaRI trial is a National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA)-funded UK multi-site, parallel group, randomised controlled, unblinded trial that will investigate the use of the FENIX MSA, as compared to SNS, for adult faecal incontinence resistant to conservative management. Twenty sites across the UK, experienced in the treatment of faecal incontinence, will recruit 350 patients randomised equally to receive either SNS or FENIX MSA. Participants will be followed-up at 2 weeks post-surgery and at 6, 12 and 18 months post-randomisation. The primary endpoint is success, as defined by device in use and ≥50 % improvement in the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) at 18 months post-randomisation. Secondary endpoints include complications, quality of life and cost effectiveness.
Discussion: SaFaRI will rigorously evaluate a new technology for faecal incontinence, the FENIX™ MSA, allowing its safe and controlled introduction into current clinical practice. These results will inform the future surgical management of adult faecal incontinence.
Keywords: FENIXTM; Faecal incontinence; Randomised controlled trial; Sacral nerve stimulation; Surgery.
Similar articles
-
SaFaRI: sacral nerve stimulation versus the Fenix® magnetic sphincter augmentation for adult faecal incontinence: a randomised investigation.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Aug;31(8):1505. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2531-8. Epub 2016 Feb 9. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016. PMID: 26861637 No abstract available.
-
Sacral nerve stimulation versus the magnetic sphincter augmentation device for adult faecal incontinence: the SaFaRI RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(18):1-96. doi: 10.3310/hta25180. Health Technol Assess. 2021. PMID: 33752794 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence related to dysfunction of the internal anal sphincter.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 May;25(5):625-30. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-0880-2. Epub 2010 Feb 2. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010. PMID: 20127098 Clinical Trial.
-
A review of sacral nerve stimulation parameters used in the treatment of faecal incontinence.Surgeon. 2015 Jun;13(3):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.11.002. Epub 2015 Jan 23. Surgeon. 2015. PMID: 25623489 Review.
-
[Faecal incontinence - serious medical and social issue].Cas Lek Cesk. 2016;155(3):25-30. Cas Lek Cesk. 2016. PMID: 27256145 Review. Czech.
Cited by
-
SaFaRI: sacral nerve stimulation versus the Fenix® magnetic sphincter augmentation for adult faecal incontinence: a randomised investigation.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Aug;31(8):1505. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2531-8. Epub 2016 Feb 9. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016. PMID: 26861637 No abstract available.
-
Fecal Incontinence: Epidemiology, Impact, and Treatment.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016 Sep;29(3):264-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584504. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016. PMID: 27582653 Free PMC article.
-
Sacral nerve stimulation versus the magnetic sphincter augmentation device for adult faecal incontinence: the SaFaRI RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(18):1-96. doi: 10.3310/hta25180. Health Technol Assess. 2021. PMID: 33752794 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Erosion Rate of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device Is Much Higher for Anal Incontinence than for Antireflux.J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb;23(2):389-390. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4032-2. Epub 2018 Nov 7. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019. PMID: 30406579 No abstract available.
-
Is magnetic anal sphincter augmentation still an option in fecal incontinence treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Mar 19;409(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03288-x. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024. PMID: 38499684
References
-
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . The management of faecal incontinence in adults. London: Clinical Guideline CG49; 2007.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources