Survey Methods to Optimize Response Rate in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network
- PMID: 26755526
- PMCID: PMC5002250
- DOI: 10.1177/0163278715625738
Survey Methods to Optimize Response Rate in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network
Abstract
Surveys of health professionals typically have low response rates, and these rates have been decreasing in the recent years. We report on the methods used in a successful survey of dentist members of the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. The objectives were to quantify the (1) increase in response rate associated with successive survey methods, (2) time to completion with each successive step, (3) contribution from the final method and personal contact, and (4) differences in response rate and mode of response by practice/practitioner characteristics. Dentist members of the network were mailed an invitation describing the study. Subsequently, up to six recruitment steps were followed: initial e-mail, two e-mail reminders at 2-week intervals, a third e-mail reminder with postal mailing a paper questionnaire, a second postal mailing of paper questionnaire, and staff follow-up. Of the 1,876 invited, 160 were deemed ineligible and 1,488 (87% of 1,716 eligible) completed the survey. Completion by step: initial e-mail, 35%; second e-mail, 15%; third e-mail, 7%; fourth e-mail/first paper, 11%; second paper, 15%; and staff follow-up, 16%. Overall, 76% completed the survey online and 24% on paper. Completion rates increased in absolute numbers and proportionally with later methods of recruitment. Participation rates varied little by practice/practitioner characteristics. Completion on paper was more likely by older dentists. Multiple methods of recruitment resulted in a high participation rate: Each step and method produced incremental increases with the final step producing the largest increase.
Keywords: dentists; health professions; online surveys; participation rates; response rates; survey methods.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
-
- American Dental Association. American Dental Association Survey Center: The 2010 survey of dental practice. Chicago, IL: Author; 2012. Jul,
-
- Asch DA, Christakis NA, Ubel PA. Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget: A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives. Medical Care. 1998;36:95–99. - PubMed
-
- Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1997;50:1129–1136. - PubMed
-
- Baruch Y, Holtom BC. Survey response rates and trends in organizational research. Human Relations. 2008;61:1139–1160.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources