Dimensional accuracy of ceramic self-ligating brackets and estimates of theoretical torsional play
- PMID: 26756375
- PMCID: PMC8600843
- DOI: 10.2319/092415-647.1
Dimensional accuracy of ceramic self-ligating brackets and estimates of theoretical torsional play
Abstract
Objective: To ascertain the dimensional accuracies of some commonly used ceramic self-ligation brackets and the amount of torsional play in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Materials and methods: Four types of 0.022-inch slot ceramic self-ligating brackets (upper right central incisor), three types of 0.018-inch ceramic self-ligating brackets (upper right central incisor), and three types of rectangular archwires (0.016 × 0.022-inch beta-titanium [TMA] (Ormco, Orange, Calif), 0.016 × 0.022-inch stainless steel [SS] (Ortho Technology, Tampa, Fla), and 0.019 × 0.025-inch SS (Ortho Technology)) were measured using a stereomicroscope to determine slot widths and wire cross-sectional dimensions. The mean acquired dimensions of the brackets and wires were applied to an equation devised by Meling to estimate torsional play angle (γ).
Results: In all bracket systems, the slot tops were significantly wider than the slot bases (P < .001), yielding a divergent slot profile. Clarity-SLs (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) showed the greatest divergence among the 0.022-inch brackets, and Clippy-Cs (Tomy, Futaba, Fukushima, Japan) among the 0.018-inch brackets. The Damon Clear (Ormco) bracket had the smallest dimensional error (0.542%), whereas the 0.022-inch Empower Clear (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wis) bracket had the largest (3.585%).
Conclusions: The largest amount of theoretical play is observed using the Empower Clear (American Orthodontics) 0.022-inch bracket combined with the 0.016 × 0.022-inch TMA wire (Ormco), whereas the least amount occurs using the 0.018 Clippy-C (Tomy) combined with 0.016 × 0.022-inch SS wire (Ortho Technology).
Keywords: Ceramic self-ligating brackets; Slot dimensions; Torsional play.
Figures
![Figure 1. Stereomicroscopic images of the brackets’ mesial profiles that were used to measure the slot dimensions: slot-base width (a), top width (b), and slot divergence angle (c). (A: Empower Clear [American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wis], B: Damon Clear [Ormco, Orange, Calif], C: Clippy-C [Tomy, Futaba, Fukushima, Japan], D: Clarity-SL [3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif]).](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/8600843/5a7404b9d437/i0003-3219-86-5-804-f01.gif)

Similar articles
-
Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):403-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00501-8. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003. PMID: 14560270
-
Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):395-402. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00504-3. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003. PMID: 14560269
-
Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.Aust Orthod J. 2004 May;20(1):25-30. Aust Orthod J. 2004. PMID: 15233584
-
Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):201-10. doi: 10.2319/080508-352.1. Angle Orthod. 2010. PMID: 19852662 Free PMC article.
-
A review and evaluation of orthodontic brackets, molar bands and orthodontic auxiliaries during orthognathic surgery: A prospective cohort study.J Orthod. 2024 Mar;51(1):79-86. doi: 10.1177/14653125231186825. Epub 2023 Jul 18. J Orthod. 2024. PMID: 37462079 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?Head Face Med. 2021 Jul 7;17(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00276-0. Head Face Med. 2021. PMID: 34233698 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of stress and displacement of maxillary canine during the single canine retraction in the maxillary first premolar extraction cases- A finite element study.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 9;28(3):206. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05590-w. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 38459220
-
Evaluating orthodontic bracket slot dimensions and morphology: A narrative review.J Orthod Sci. 2023 Sep 4;12:40. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_39_23. eCollection 2023. J Orthod Sci. 2023. PMID: 37881671 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT).Tomography. 2023 Jul 13;9(4):1369-1380. doi: 10.3390/tomography9040109. Tomography. 2023. PMID: 37489477 Free PMC article.
-
Variability of slot size in orthodontic brackets.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019 Jul 11;5(5):528-533. doi: 10.1002/cre2.219. eCollection 2019 Oct. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019. PMID: 31687187 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Urias D, Mustafa FI. Anchorage control in bioprogressive vs straight-wire treatment. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:987–992. - PubMed
-
- McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. Anchorage control during leveling and aligning with a preadjusted appliance system. J Clin Orthod. 1991;25:687–696. - PubMed
-
- Andrews LF. Straight Wire The Concept and Appliance. San Diego, Calif: LA Wells Company; 1989.
-
- Cash AC, Good SA, Curtis RV, McDonald F. An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets—are standards as expected. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:450–453. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources