Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;12(1):20150883.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0883.

Dogs recognize dog and human emotions

Affiliations

Dogs recognize dog and human emotions

Natalia Albuquerque et al. Biol Lett. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

The perception of emotional expressions allows animals to evaluate the social intentions and motivations of each other. This usually takes place within species; however, in the case of domestic dogs, it might be advantageous to recognize the emotions of humans as well as other dogs. In this sense, the combination of visual and auditory cues to categorize others' emotions facilitates the information processing and indicates high-level cognitive representations. Using a cross-modal preferential looking paradigm, we presented dogs with either human or dog faces with different emotional valences (happy/playful versus angry/aggressive) paired with a single vocalization from the same individual with either a positive or negative valence or Brownian noise. Dogs looked significantly longer at the face whose expression was congruent to the valence of vocalization, for both conspecifics and heterospecifics, an ability previously known only in humans. These results demonstrate that dogs can extract and integrate bimodal sensory emotional information, and discriminate between positive and negative emotions from both humans and dogs.

Keywords: Canis familiaris; cross-modal sensory integration; emotion recognition; social cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Schematic apparatus. R2: researcher, C: camera, S: screens, L: loudspeakers, P: projectors, R1: researcher. (b) Examples of stimuli used in the study: faces (human happy versus angry, dog playful versus aggressive) and their correspondent vocalizations.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Dogs' viewing behaviour (calculated as congruence index). (a) Species of stimulus; (b) valence of stimulus; (c) sex of stimulus; (d) side of stimulus presentation. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

References

    1. Schmidt KL, Cohn JF. 2001. Human expressions as adaptations: evolutionary questions in facial expression research. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 33, 3–24. (10.1002/ajpa.20001) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parr LA, Winslow JT, Hopkins WD, de Waal FBM. 2000. Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J. Comp. Psychol. 114, 47–60. (10.1037/0735-7036.114.1.47) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campanella S, Belin P. 2007. Integrating face and voice in person perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 535–543. (10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.001) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yuval-Greenberg S, Deouell LY. 2009. The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition. Exp. Brain Res. 193, 603–614. (10.1007/s00221-008-1664-6) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ghazanfar AA, Logothetis NK. 2003. Facial expressions linked to monkey calls. Nature 423, 937–938. (10.1038/423937a) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types