Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 Jul;95(1):75-9.
doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0565.

Apparent viscosity of materials used for making edentulous impressions

Apparent viscosity of materials used for making edentulous impressions

A Koran 3rd et al. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977 Jul.

Abstract

The viscosity of commercially available impression materials used for making edentulous impressions was determined as a function of time and rotational speed. The impression materials studied showed large differences in viscosity and could be ranked into three groups. The values for one group--Plastogum, Ackerman cement (1:1 powder-to-liquid ratio), and light-bodied Permlastic--ranged from 23,800 cp to 57,200 cp. The viscosity values for a second group--Unilastic, syringe Elasticon, Luralite, and Coe-Flo--ranged from 92,200 cp to 107,000 cp. For a third group--Omniflex, Jeltrate, and Ackerman cement (2:1 powder-to-liquid ratio)--the viscosity values ranged from 239,000 cp to 257,000 cp. Light-bodied Permlastic, Ackerman cement (1:1 powder-to-liquid ratio), Jeltrate, and syringe Elasticon functioned as Newtonian liquids immediately after mixing. All other materials were non-Newtonian in behavior. The viscosity of most impression materials increased dramatically with time; the only exceptions were the zinc oxide-eugenol impression materials.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources