Does an Electronic Health Record Improve Completeness of Prenatal Studies?
- PMID: 26767062
- PMCID: PMC4704036
- DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2015-05-RA-0062
Does an Electronic Health Record Improve Completeness of Prenatal Studies?
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether implementation of an electronic health record (EHR) would increase the rate of prenatal Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and purified protein derivative (PPD) testing.
Methods: Eligible participants received prenatal care and delivered at term at a single academic institution in March-April 2011, March-April 2012, and March-April 2013. As part of routine prenatal care, all women were tested for HIV and tuberculosis (via a PPD test) during each pregnancy. The 2011 cohort was charted on paper. The 2012 and 2013 cohorts were charted via EHR. To appear in the prenatal labs display in EHR, PPD results must be manually documented, while HIV results are uploaded automatically. Documentation of PPD and HIV tests were analyzed.
Results: The 2011, 2012, and 2013 cohorts had 249, 208, and 190 patients, respectively. Complete PPD and HIV results were less likely to be charted in the 2012 EHR cohort compared to the paper chart cohort (72.1% vs. 80.1%; p=0.03). This was driven by fewer documented completed PPD tests (2011 83.9% vs. 2012 72.6%; p=0.003). PPD test documentation improved non-significantly to 86.2% in the 2013 EHR cohort (p=0.5). HIV documentation rates increased from 95.2% in the paper chart cohort to 98.6% in the 2012 EHR cohort (p=0.04), and to 98.9% in the 2013 EHR cohort (p=0.03).
Conclusions: EHR implementation corresponded with a marked decrease in documentation of PPD test completion. HIV documentation rates improved. PPD results were likely charted incorrectly in provider notes due to training deficiencies and lack of standardization, which did not improve significantly after retraining.
Keywords: Electronic health record; prenatal care.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest. There was no source of financial support for this study, nor funding from any organization.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Unintended adverse consequences of electronic health record introduction to a mature universal HIV screening program.AIDS Care. 2016;28(5):566-73. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1127319. Epub 2016 Jan 5. AIDS Care. 2016. PMID: 26729258
-
Impact of an electronic health record operating room management system in ophthalmology on documentation time, surgical volume, and staffing.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 May;132(5):586-92. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.8196. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24676217
-
Prevalence of tuberculin positivity and skin test anergy in HIV-1-seropositive and -seronegative intravenous drug users.JAMA. 1992 Jan 15;267(3):369-73. JAMA. 1992. PMID: 1727959
-
Sharing of clinical data in a maternity setting: how do paper hand-held records and electronic health records compare for completeness?BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 21;14:650. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0650-x. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 25528664 Free PMC article.
-
eHealth 2015 Special Issue: Impact of Electronic Health Records on the Completeness of Clinical Documentation Generated during Diabetic Retinopathy Consultations.Appl Clin Inform. 2015 Jul 29;6(3):478-87. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-11-RA-0104. eCollection 2015. Appl Clin Inform. 2015. PMID: 26448793 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A Survey of the Literature on Unintended Consequences Associated with Health Information Technology: 2014-2015.Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10;(1):13-29. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-036. Yearb Med Inform. 2016. PMID: 27830227 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Electronic Health Record Driven Prediction for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Early Pregnancy.Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 27;7(1):16417. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16665-y. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 29180800 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. New Engl J Med 2009; 360(15):1477–1479. - PubMed
-
- Metz JP, Son SJ, Winter RO, Chae S. Increasing timely and available prenatal studies by electronic health records. J Am Board Fam Med 2011; 24(4):344–350. - PubMed
-
- Persell SD, Kaiser D, Dolan NC, Andrews B, Levi S, Khandekar J, Gavagan T, Thompson JA, Friesema EM, Baker DW. Changes in performance after implementation of a multifaceted electronic-health-record based quality improvement system. Med Care 2011; 49(2):117–125. - PubMed
-
- Varroud-Vial M. Improving diabetes management with electronic medical records. Diabetes Metab 2011; 37(Suppl 4): S48-S52. - PubMed
-
- Eden KB, Messina R, Li H, Osterweil P, Henderson CR, Guise JM. Examining the value of electronic health records on labor and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199(3): 307 e1–e9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous