Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 May;24(5):2381-2392.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3075-8. Epub 2016 Jan 15.

Efficacy of olanzapine for the prophylaxis and rescue of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of olanzapine for the prophylaxis and rescue of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Leonard Chiu et al. Support Care Cancer. 2016 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Olanzapine is a potent antipsychotic medication that inhibits a wide variety of receptors. It has been used in trials for the prophylaxis and rescue of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This study systematically investigates the efficacy of olanzapine in relation to other antiemetics in the prophylaxis and rescue of CINV.

Methods: A literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing olanzapine to other standard antiemetics for either prevention or rescue. The primary endpoints were the percentage of patients achieving no emesis or no nausea, in the acute, delayed, and overall phases.

Results: Ten RCTs in the preventative setting and three RCTs in the breakthrough setting were identified. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a similar degree of benefit from a 5- and 10-mg dose of olanzapine for the no emesis endpoint in the overall phase. In the prophylaxis setting, olanzapine was statistically superior in five of six endpoints and clinically superior in four of six endpoints. In the breakthrough setting, olanzapine was statistically and clinically superior in the only endpoint analyzed: no emesis.

Conclusion: Olanzapine is more efficacious than other standard antiemetics for the rescue of CINV and its inclusion improves control in the prevention setting. Given the possible reduction in side effects, the use of a 5-mg dose of olanzapine should be considered. Future RCTs should compare the 5-mg versus the 10-mg dosages further and report on the efficacy and percentage of patients developing side effects. Further analyses should be done without the influence of corticosteroids.

Keywords: Breakthrough emesis; Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting; Efficacy; Olanzapine; Prophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Osoba D, Zee B, Warr D, Latreille J, Kaizer L, Pater J (1997) Effect of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting on health-related quality of life. Support Care Cancer 5(4):307–313 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ et al (2011) Antiemetic American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 29:4189–98 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Hocking CM, Kichenadasse G (2014) Olanzapine for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 22(4):1143–1151 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Srivastava M, Brito-Dellan N, Davis MP, Leach M, Lagman R (2003) Olanzapine as an antiemetic in refractory nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 25(6):578–582 - DOI
    1. Navari RM, Einhorn LH, Passik SD, Loehrer PJ, Johnson C, Mayer ML et al (2005) A phase II trial of olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. Support Care Cancer 13(7):529–534 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources