Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;50(3):370-84.
doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9763-7.

Dispositional and Situational Avoidance and Approach as Predictors of Physical Symptom Bother Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Margaret R Bauer  1 , Lauren N Harris  1 , Joshua F Wiley  1 , Catherine M Crespi  2   3 , Jennifer L Krull  1 , Karen L Weihs  4   5 , Annette L Stanton  6   7   8
Affiliations

Dispositional and Situational Avoidance and Approach as Predictors of Physical Symptom Bother Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Margaret R Bauer et al. Ann Behav Med. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Few studies examine whether dispositional approach and avoidance coping and stressor-specific coping strategies differentially predict physical adjustment to cancer-related stress.

Purpose: This study examines dispositional and situational avoidance and approach coping as unique predictors of the bother women experience from physical symptoms after breast cancer treatment, as well as whether situational coping mediates the prediction of bother from physical symptoms by dispositional coping.

Method: Breast cancer patients (N = 460) diagnosed within the past 3 months completed self-report measures of dispositional coping at study entry and of situational coping and bother from physical symptoms every 6 weeks through 6 months.

Results: In multilevel structural equation modeling analyses, both dispositional and situational avoidance predict greater symptom bother. Dispositional, but not situational, approach predicts less symptom bother. Supporting mediation models, dispositional avoidance predicts more symptom bother indirectly through greater situational avoidance. Dispositional approach predicts less symptom bother through less situational avoidance.

Conclusion: Psychosocial interventions to reduce cancer-related avoidance coping are warranted for cancer survivors who are high in dispositional avoidance and/or low in dispositional approach.

Keywords: Approach; Avoidance; Breast cancer; Coping; Physical symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram of the 2-1-1 mediation model testing situational coping as a mediator of the relationship between dispositional coping and physical symptom bother
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall mean symptom trajectory for BCPT Symptom Scales
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer; New York: 1984.
    1. Aldwin CM, Park CL. Coping and physical health outcomes: An overview. Psychol Health. 2004;19:277–281.
    1. Haan N. A tripartite model of ego functioning: Values and clinical research applications. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1969;148:946–955. - PubMed
    1. Bouchard G, Guillemette A, Landry-Leger N. Situational and dispositional coping: An examination of their relation to personality, cognitive appraisals, and psychological distress. Eur J Pers. 2004;18:221–238.
    1. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;56:267–283. - PubMed

Publication types