Differences in Women's Use of Medical Help for Becoming Pregnant by the Level of Urbanization of County of Residence in Georgia
- PMID: 26769080
- PMCID: PMC4945485
- DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12172
Differences in Women's Use of Medical Help for Becoming Pregnant by the Level of Urbanization of County of Residence in Georgia
Abstract
Purpose: Our goal was to determine if there are differences by place of residence in visiting a doctor for help getting pregnant in a population-based study.
Methods: Using data from the Furthering Understanding of Cancer, Health, and Survivorship in Adult (FUCHSIA) Women's Study, a cohort study of fertility outcomes in reproductive-aged women in Georgia, we fit models to estimate the association between geographic type of residence and seeking help for becoming pregnant.
Findings: The prevalence of visiting a doctor for help getting pregnant ranged from 13% to 17% across geographic groups. Women living in suburban counties were most likely to seek medical care for help getting pregnant compared with women living in urbanized counties (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.74-1.75); among women who reported infertility this difference was more pronounced (aPR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.00-2.53). Women living in rural counties were equally likely to seek fertility care compared with women in urbanized counties in the full sample and among women who experienced infertility.
Conclusions: Women living in urban and rural counties were least likely to seek infertility care, suggesting that factors including but not limited to physical proximity to providers are influencing utilization of this type of care. Increased communication about reproductive goals and infertility care available to meet these goals by providers who women see for regular care may help address these barriers.
Keywords: access to care; fertility care; geographic disparities; infertility; utilization of health services.
© 2016 National Rural Health Association.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Health and Health Care Access of Rural Women Veterans: Findings From the National Survey of Women Veterans.J Rural Health. 2016 Sep;32(4):397-406. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12197. Epub 2016 Jul 28. J Rural Health. 2016. PMID: 27466970
-
Racial Disparities in Seeking Care for Help Getting Pregnant.Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;29(5):416-25. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12210. Epub 2015 Jul 22. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 26201443 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of rural-urban differences in health care provider visits among women of reproductive age in the United States.PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0240700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240700. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33301492 Free PMC article.
-
The need for data on women living with HIV in Europe.Antivir Ther. 2013;18 Suppl 2:1-10. doi: 10.3851/IMP2640. Epub 2013 Jun 19. Antivir Ther. 2013. PMID: 23784746 Review.
-
What do we know about the situation of women living with HIV in Europe?Antivir Ther. 2013;18 Suppl 2:11-7. doi: 10.3851/IMP2646. Epub 2013 Jun 19. Antivir Ther. 2013. PMID: 23784755 Review.
Cited by
-
Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review.Reprod Sci. 2023 Aug;30(8):2373-2396. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6. Epub 2023 Apr 26. Reprod Sci. 2023. PMID: 37099229 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of sickle cell disease and its treatment on ovarian reserve in reproductive-aged Black women.Br J Haematol. 2024 Aug;205(2):674-685. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19582. Epub 2024 Jun 6. Br J Haematol. 2024. PMID: 38841818 Free PMC article.
-
Inequity of Access: Scoping the Barriers to Assisted Reproductive Technologies.Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Jan 16;11(1):17. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11010017. Pharmacy (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36649027 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pharmacists' roles in assisted reproductive technology.Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Nov 22;12:100376. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100376. eCollection 2023 Dec. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023. PMID: 38094712 Free PMC article.
-
Strong social disparities in access to IVF/ICSI despite free cost of treatment: a French population-based nationwide cohort study.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Nov 22;23(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02784-4. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 37993813 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chachamovich JR, Chachamovich E, Ezer H, Fleck MP, Knauth D, Passos EP. Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review. Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology. 2010;31(2):101–110. - PubMed
-
- Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford S, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) 2013;62(9):1–24. - PubMed
-
- Nangia AK, Likosky DS, Wang D. Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States. Fertility and sterility. 2010;93(3):745–761. - PubMed
-
- Chandra A, Copen CE, Stephen EH. Infertility service use in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982-2010. National health statistics reports. 2014;(73):1–21. - PubMed
-
- Missmer SA, Seifer DB, Jain T. Cultural factors contributing to health care disparities among patients with infertility in Midwestern United States. Fertility & Sterility. 2011;95(6):1943–1949. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous