Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;31(5):405-12.
doi: 10.1177/1533317515622283. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

Toxicological Differences Between NMDA Receptor Antagonists and Cholinesterase Inhibitors

Affiliations

Toxicological Differences Between NMDA Receptor Antagonists and Cholinesterase Inhibitors

Xiaodong Shi et al. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs), represented by donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine, used to be the only approved class of drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. After the approval of memantine by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonists have been recognized by authorities and broadly used in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Along with complementary mechanisms of action, NMDA antagonists and ChEIs differ not only in therapeutic effects but also in adverse reactions, which is an important consideration in clinical drug use. And the number of patients using NMDA antagonists and ChEIs concomitantly has increased, making the matter more complicated. Here we used the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System for statistical analysis , in order to compare the adverse events of memantine and ChEIs. In general, the clinical evidence confirmed the safety advantages of memantine over ChEIs, reiterating the precautions of clinical drug use and the future direction of antidementia drug development.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS); NMDA receptor antagonists; cholinesterase inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The adverse reactions referred to in Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug labels.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Qiu C, Kivipelto M, von Strauss E. Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: occurrence, determinants, and strategies toward intervention. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(2):111–128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brookmeyer R, Johnson E, Ziegler-Graham K, et al. . Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2007;3(3):186–191. - PubMed
    1. Alzheimer’s Association. 2013 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(2):208–245. - PubMed
    1. Bian L, Yang JD, Guo TW, et al. . Association study of the A2 M and LRP1 Genes with Alzheimer disease in the Han Chinese. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58(9):731–737. - PubMed
    1. Holtzman DM, Morris JC, Goate AM. Alzheimer’s disease: the challenge of the second century. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(77):77sr1. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources