Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015:2015:840640.
doi: 10.1155/2015/840640. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

Steroid Hormone Receptor Signals as Prognosticators for Urothelial Tumor

Affiliations
Review

Steroid Hormone Receptor Signals as Prognosticators for Urothelial Tumor

Hiroki Ide et al. Dis Markers. 2015.

Abstract

There is a substantial amount of preclinical or clinical evidence suggesting that steroid hormone receptor-mediated signals play a critical role in urothelial tumorigenesis and tumor progression. These receptors include androgen receptor, estrogen receptors, glucocorticoid receptor, progesterone receptor, vitamin D receptor, retinoid receptors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, and others including orphan receptors. In particular, studies using urothelial cancer tissue specimens have demonstrated that elevated or reduced expression of these receptors as well as alterations of their upstream or downstream pathways correlates with patient outcomes. This review summarizes and discusses available data suggesting that steroid hormone receptors and related signals serve as biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma and are able to predict tumor recurrence or progression.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Torre L. A., Bray F., Siegel R. L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA—A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2015;65(2):87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zheng C., Lv Y., Zhong Q., Wang R., Jiang Q. Narrow band imaging diagnosis of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU International. 2012;110(11):E680–E687. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11500.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Helenius M., Brekkan E., Dahlman P., Lönnemark M., Magnusson A. Bladder cancer detection in patients with gross haematuria: computed tomography urography with enhancement-triggered scan versus flexible cystoscopy. Scandinavian Journal of Urology. 2015;49(5):377–381. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2015.1026937. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Kessel K. E., van Neste L., Lurkin I., Zwarthoff E. C., van Criekinge W. Evaluation of an epigenetic profile for the detection of bladder cancer in hematuria patients. The Journal of Urology. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.085. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raitanen M.-P., Aine R., Rintala E., et al. Differences between local and review urinary cytology in diagnosis of bladder cancer. An interobserver multicenter analysis. European Urology. 2002;41(3):284–289. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00006-4. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms