Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 May;88(5):483-7.

The diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography in pancreatic disorders

  • PMID: 2677230

The diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography in pancreatic disorders

J T Lin et al. Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi. 1989 May.

Abstract

The introduction of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) makes it possible to demonstrate the pancreas in detail by intraluminal scanning. To assess the clinical usefulness of EUS in the diagnosis of pancreatic disorders, 33 patients with various pancreatic disorders were examined by conventional ultrasonography (US) and EUS concomitantly. There were 16 patients with pancreatic carcinomas: 7 chronic pancreatitis, 5 pseudocysts, 2 mucinous cystadenocarcinomas, one each serous cystadenoma, Von-Hippel-Lindau disease, and simple cyst of the pancreas. An Olympus EUS (Japan) radial type machine with a 7.5 MHz transducer with the balloon inflation method was used. The overall diagnostic sensitivity of conventional US (90.9%, 30/33) was as high as that of EUS (93.9%, 31/33), but the latter demonstrated pancreatic parenchyma more clearly. Three patients were misdiagnosed by conventional US. One patient with chronic calcifying pancreatitis, which was initially diagnosed as dilatation of the main pancreatic duct without evidence of calcifications by conventional US, was confirmed to have a trace of calcification by EUS and computed tomography. Two other patients, whose initial diagnosis was pseudocyst, were proved to have mucinous cystadenocarcinoma and serous cystadenoma respectively by EUS, as a result of improved image resolution. Two patients were misdiagnosed by EUS. One patient with carcinoma of the pancreatic head was missed by EUS because of a partially gastrectomized stomach which precluded successful observation. The other patient with cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreatic tail was misdiagnosed as pseudocyst by EUS due to non-visualization of a papillary crescent within a cystic tumor. We conclude that EUS and conventional US were complementary.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources