Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 15;7(1):149-56.
doi: 10.3945/an.115.009365. Print 2016 Jan.

Sugars and Dental Caries: Evidence for Setting a Recommended Threshold for Intake

Affiliations

Sugars and Dental Caries: Evidence for Setting a Recommended Threshold for Intake

Paula Moynihan. Adv Nutr. .

Abstract

Dental caries affects ≤80% of the world's population with almost a quarter of US adults having untreated caries. Dental caries is costly to health care and negatively affects well-being. Dietary free sugars are the most important risk factor for dental caries. The WHO has issued guidelines that recommend intake of free sugars should provide ≤10% of energy intake and suggest further reductions to <5% of energy to protect dental health throughout life. These recommendations were informed by a systematic review of the evidence pertaining to amount of sugars and dental caries risk, which showed evidence of moderate quality from cohort studies that limiting free sugars to ≤10% of energy reduced, but did not eliminate, dental caries. Even low levels of dental caries in children are of concern because caries is a lifelong progressive and cumulative disease. The systematic review therefore explored if there were further benefits to dental health if the intake of free sugars was limited to <5% of energy. Available data were from ecologic studies and, although classified as being of low quality, showed lower dental caries when free sugar intake was <5% of energy compared with when it was >5% but ≤10% of energy. The WHO recommendations are intended for use by policy makers as a benchmark when assessing intake of sugars by populations and as a driving force for policy change. Multiple strategies encompassing both upstream and downstream preventive approaches are now required to translate the recommendations into policy and practice.

Keywords: dental caries; dietary recommendations; dose response; food policy; oral health; sugars.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author disclosure: P Moynihan, no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Petersen PE. WHO global policy for improvement of oral health. World Health Assembly 2007. Int Dent J 2008;58:115–21. - PubMed
    1. WHO. Sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva: WHO; 2015. - PubMed
    1. Moynihan PJ, Kelly SA. Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake: systematic review to inform WHO guidelines. J Dent Res 2014;93:8–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. CDC [Internet]. Atlanta: The Organization. Oral and Dental Health. [cited 2015 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.CDC.gov/nchs/fastats/dental.htm.
    1. Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report 2003. Geneva: WHO; 2003. [cited 2014 Feb 27]. Available from: http://www.who.int/oral_health/media/en/orh_report03_en.pdf.

Publication types

Substances