Quantitative Imaging in Cancer Clinical Trials
- PMID: 26773162
- PMCID: PMC4717912
- DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3336
Quantitative Imaging in Cancer Clinical Trials
Abstract
As anticancer therapies designed to target specific molecular pathways have been developed, it has become critical to develop methods to assess the response induced by such agents. Although traditional, anatomic CT, and MRI examinations are useful in many settings, increasing evidence suggests that these methods cannot answer the fundamental biologic and physiologic questions essential for assessment and, eventually, prediction of treatment response in the clinical trial setting, especially in the critical period soon after treatment is initiated. To optimally apply advances in quantitative imaging methods to trials of targeted cancer therapy, new infrastructure improvements are needed that incorporate these emerging techniques into the settings where they are most likely to have impact. In this review, we first elucidate the needs for therapeutic response assessment in the era of molecularly targeted therapy and describe how quantitative imaging can most effectively provide scientifically and clinically relevant data. We then describe the tools and methods required to apply quantitative imaging and provide concrete examples of work making these advances practically available for routine application in clinical trials. We conclude by proposing strategies to surmount barriers to wider incorporation of these quantitative imaging methods into clinical trials and, eventually, clinical practice. Our goal is to encourage and guide the oncology community to deploy standardized quantitative imaging techniques in clinical trials to further personalize care for cancer patients and to provide a more efficient path for the development of improved targeted therapies.
©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Piessevaux H, Buyse M, Schlichting M, Van Cutsem E, Bokemeyer C, Heeger S, et al. Use of early tumor shrinkage to predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3764–75. - PubMed
-
- Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47. - PubMed
-
- Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1963–72. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- U01 CA190254/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA142565/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA148131/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA142565/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA160045/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA140206/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA154601/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA143062/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA140204/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA143062/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA148131/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA140230/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA140207/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA151235/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA154602/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA142555/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA190214/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA140206/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA151261/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA140204/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA154602/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA140207/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA151235/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 CA016520/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA154601/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA190254/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA140230/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA160045/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA142555/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA151261/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials