Clinical performance of the Food and Drug Administration-Approved high-risk HPV test for the detection of high-grade cervicovaginal lesions
- PMID: 26774025
- DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21687
Clinical performance of the Food and Drug Administration-Approved high-risk HPV test for the detection of high-grade cervicovaginal lesions
Abstract
Background: In recent years, high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing for triaging atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and cotesting with cytology have been implemented in clinical practice. However, clinical data for primary screening with human papillomavirus (HPV) testing alone are currently lacking.
Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed the correlation of cytology, histology, and hrHPV testing through the use of a cytology laboratory quality assurance database with 130,648 Papanicolaou (Pap) tests interpreted at Houston BioReference Laboratories and Houston Methodist Hospital between March 1, 2013 and June 30, 2014. Among the 47,499 patients who had undergone cytology-HPV cotesting, 1654 underwent follow-up biopsies.
Results: The sensitivities of the hrHPV and Pap tests were 80.8% and 81.2%, respectively, for detecting any type of cervicovaginal dysplasia and 91.3% and 90.9%, respectively, for high-grade cervicovaginal lesions. For biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervicovaginal lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+, adenocarcinoma in situ, or carcinoma; n = 253), the false-negative rates for hrHPV and Pap tests were 8.7% and 9.1%, respectively. The false-negative rate for cytology-hrHPV cotesting was only 1.2%.
Conclusions: In clinical practice, the hrHPV test alone is not significantly superior to the Pap test as a primary screening method for cervicovaginal lesions. The false-negative rate of the hrHPV test in detecting biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervicovaginal lesions is comparable to the rate of the Pap test. Women with cytology and hrHPV cotesting, however, have a significantly lower false-negative rate than those undergoing either test alone. Currently, cytology-HPV cotesting remains the best strategy for detecting high-grade cervicovaginal lesions. Cancer Cytopathol 2016;124:317-23. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Keywords: College of American Pathologists (CAP) benchmark; Papanicolaou (Pap) test; cotesting; high-grade cervicovaginal lesion; human papillomavirus (HPV) test.
© 2016 American Cancer Society.
Similar articles
-
Cytology and human papillomavirus screening test results associated with 2827 histopathologic diagnoses of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Jul;137(7):942-7. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0307-OA. Epub 2012 Oct 10. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013. PMID: 23050808
-
Retrospective analysis of HPV infection: Cotesting and HPV genotyping in cervical cancer screening within a large academic health care system.Cancer Cytopathol. 2025 Jan;133(1):e22916. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22916. Epub 2024 Nov 5. Cancer Cytopathol. 2025. PMID: 39498509
-
Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus in women with abnormal and normal vaginal ThinPrep Papanicolaou cytology.J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011 Apr;15(2):105-9. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181f41ee4. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011. PMID: 21317806
-
Aptima HPV messenger RNA testing and histopathologic follow-up in women with HSIL cytology: A study emphasizing additional review of HPV-negative cases.Cancer Cytopathol. 2021 Aug;129(8):622-631. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22421. Epub 2021 Mar 25. Cancer Cytopathol. 2021. PMID: 33764649 Review.
-
Cervical Cancer Screening: A Review.JAMA. 2023 Aug 8;330(6):547-558. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13174. JAMA. 2023. PMID: 37552298 Review.
Cited by
-
Psychological Impact of Primary Screening (PIPS) for HPV: a protocol for a cross-sectional evaluation within the NHS cervical screening programme.BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 23;6(12):e014356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014356. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 28011816 Free PMC article.
-
Candidate biomarkers in the cervical vaginal fluid for the (self-)diagnosis of cervical precancer.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Feb;297(2):295-311. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4587-2. Epub 2017 Nov 15. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018. PMID: 29143101 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Relative Performance of HPV and Cytology Components of Cotesting in Cervical Screening.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 May 1;110(5):501-508. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx225. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018. PMID: 29145648 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal Papanicolaou Smear Conditions for Manual Microdissection of Single Target Cells.Microorganisms. 2023 Nov 3;11(11):2700. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112700. Microorganisms. 2023. PMID: 38004711 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of the effectiveness of HPV16/18 infection referred for colposcopy in cervical cancer screening in Northwest of China.J Med Virol. 2018 Jan;90(1):165-171. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24902. Epub 2017 Oct 17. J Med Virol. 2018. PMID: 28710863 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous