Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug-Sep;48(7):449-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2015.09.009. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

[Ability to detect psychiatric disorders by the family physician]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations

[Ability to detect psychiatric disorders by the family physician]

[Article in Spanish]
Sofía Garrido-Elustondo et al. Aten Primaria. 2016 Aug-Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the ability of family physicians to detect psychiatric disorders, comparing the presence of psychiatric disorders detected using validated tests and referrals by family physicians.

Design: Cross-sectional, two-phase study.

Location: Primary healthcare centres in an urban area of Madrid.

Participants: Patients between 18 and 65years attending primary healthcare centres for non-administrative purposes.

Main measurements: To detect psychiatric disorders in the waiting room, an interview was performed using GHQ-28 and MULTICAGE CAD-4 in the screening phase (considered positive: score of 6 or higher on the GHQ-28 or a score 2 or higher on MULTICAGE CAD-4). Patients with a positive score and 20% with negative were recruited for the second phase (case identification) using MINI interview. During family physician consultation, the patient gave his doctor a card with an identification number to record the presence of psychiatric illness in his/her opinion and whether there was treatment with psychotropic drugs.

Results: A total of 628 subjects participated. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders corrected by two phase methodology was 31.7% (95%CI: 27.9 to 35.5). Of the 185 patients with a psychiatric disorder detected, 44.2% (95%CI: 36.7 to 51.7) were identified as patients with psychiatric disorders by their family physician. Disorders best detected were: hypomania, dysthymic disorder, depressive episode with melancholic symptoms, and panic disorder.

Conclusions: A significant percentage of patients with possible psychiatric disorders detected with validated test have not been identified by their family physician.

Objetivo: Conocer la capacidad de detección de patología psiquiátrica por el médico de familia, comparando la presencia de patología psiquiátrica detectada mediante test validados y la referida por su médico de familia.

Diseño: Estudio transversal de doble fase.

Emplazamiento: Centros de Salud de un área urbana de Madrid.

Participantes: Pacientes entre 18 y 65 años que acuden a consulta por motivos no administrativos.

Mediciones principales: Para la detección de posible patología psiquiátrica, en la sala de espera se utilizaron instrumentos de cribado, el GHQ-28 (punto de corte 6 o superior) y el MULTICAGE CAD-4 (punto de corte 2 o superior). Como instrumento de identificación de «caso» en la segunda fase se utilizó la entrevista MINI en los pacientes con puntuación positiva en uno de los instrumentos de cribado y un 20% de los negativos. Por otro lado, cuando los pacientes entraban en la consulta entregaban a su médico una tarjeta con un número de identificación para que, de manera ciega, registrase: presencia de patología psiquiátrica actual según su criterio y existencia, o no, de tratamiento actual con psicofármacos.

Resultados: Participaron 628 sujetos. La prevalencia de patología psiquiátrica corregida por metodología de doble fase fue del 31,7% (IC 95%: 27,9-35,5). De 185 pacientes con patología psiquiátrica detectada, el 44,2% (IC 95%: 36,7-51,7) fueron identificados como pacientes con patología psiquiátrica por su médico de familia. Las patologías mejor identificadas fueron: hipomanía, trastorno distímico, episodio depresivo con síntomas melancólicos y trastorno por angustia.

Conclusiones: Un porcentaje importante de pacientes con patología psiquiátrica detectada con test validados no han sido identificados por su médico de familia.

Keywords: Atención primaria; Habilidad diagnóstica; Patología psiquiátrica; Primary care; Psychiatric disorder; Recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figura 1
Figura 1
Distribución de frecuencias de la patología detectada en los pacientes mediante la entrevista MINI (n = 628).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reneses B., Garrido-Elustondo S., Navalon A., Martin O., Ramos I., Fuentes M. Psychiatric morbidity and predisposing factors in a primary care population in Madrid. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015;61:275–286. - PubMed
    1. Norton J., de Roquefeuil G., David M., Boulenger J.P., Ritchie K., Mann A. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in French general practice using the patient health questionnaire: Comparison with GP case-recognition and psychotropic medication prescription. Encephale. 2009;35:560–569. - PubMed
    1. Ansseau M., Dierick M., Buntinchkx F., Cnoekaert P., de Snedt J., van Den H. High prevalence of mental disorders in primary care. J Affect Disord. 2004;78:48–59. - PubMed
    1. Serrano-Blanco A., Palao D.J., Luciano J.V., Pinto-Meza A., Lujan L., Fernandez A. Prevalence of mental disorders in primary care: Results from the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders in primary care study (DASMAP) Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010;45:201–210. - PubMed
    1. Roca M., Gili M., García-García M., Salva J., Vives M., Garcia C. Prevalence and comorbidity of common mental disorders in primary care. J Affect Disord. 2009;119:52–58. - PubMed

Substances