Diagnostic strategy and timing of intervention in infected necrotizing pancreatitis: an international expert survey and case vignette study
- PMID: 26776851
- PMCID: PMC4766363
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.07.003
Diagnostic strategy and timing of intervention in infected necrotizing pancreatitis: an international expert survey and case vignette study
Abstract
Background: The optimal diagnostic strategy and timing of intervention in infected necrotizing pancreatitis is subject to debate. We performed a survey on these topics amongst a group of international expert pancreatologists.
Methods: An online survey including case vignettes was sent to 118 international pancreatologists. We evaluated the use and timing of fine needle aspiration (FNA), antibiotics, catheter drainage and (minimally invasive) necrosectomy.
Results: The response rate was 74% (N = 87). None of the respondents use FNA routinely, 85% selectively and 15% never. Most respondents (87%) use a step-up approach in patients with infected necrosis. Walled-off necrosis (WON) is considered a prerequisite for endoscopic drainage and percutaneous drainage by 66% and 12%, respectively. After diagnosing infected necrosis, 55% routinely postpone invasive interventions, whereas 45% proceed immediately to intervention. Lack of consensus about timing of intervention was apparent on day 14 with proven infected necrosis (58% intervention vs. 42% non-invasive) as well as on day 20 with only clinically suspected infected necrosis (59% intervention vs. 41% non-invasive).
Discussion: The step-up approach is the preferred treatment strategy in infected necrotizing pancreatitis amongst expert pancreatologists. There is no uniformity regarding the use of FNA and timing of intervention in the first 2-3 weeks of infected necrotizing pancreatitis.
Copyright © 2015 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Fagenholz P.J., Fernández-del Castillo C., Harris N.S., Pelletier A.J., Camargo C.A., Jr. Direct medical costs of acute pancreatitis hospitalizations in the United States. Pancreas. 2007;35:302–307. - PubMed
-
- Uhl W., Warshaw A., Imrie C., Bassi C., McKay C.J., Lankisch P.G. IAP guidelines for the surgical management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2002;2:565–573. - PubMed
-
- Van Santvoort H.C., Bakker O.J., Bollen T.L., Besselink M.G., Ahmed Ali U., Schrijver A.M. A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1254–1263. - PubMed
-
- Wormer B.A., Swan R.Z., Williams K.B., Bradley J.F., 3rd, Walters A.L., Augenstein V.A. Outcomes of pancreatic debridement in acute pancreatitis: analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample from 1998 to 2010. Am J Surg. 2014 Sep;208:350–356. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical