Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 1:41:331-357.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659. Epub 2015 May 4.

STEM Education

Yu Xie  1 , Michael Fang  1 , Kimberlee Shauman  2
Affiliations

STEM Education

Yu Xie et al. Annu Rev Sociol. .

Abstract

Improving science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, especially for traditionally disadvantaged groups, is widely recognized as pivotal to the U.S.'s long-term economic growth and security. In this article, we review and discuss current research on STEM education in the U.S., drawing on recent research in sociology and related fields. The reviewed literature shows that different social factors affect the two major components of STEM education attainment: (1) attainment of education in general, and (2) attainment of STEM education relative to non-STEM education conditional on educational attainment. Cognitive and social psychological characteristics matter for both major components, as do structural influences at the neighborhood, school, and broader cultural levels. However, while commonly used measures of socioeconomic status (SES) predict the attainment of general education, social psychological factors are more important influences on participation and achievement in STEM versus non-STEM education. Domestically, disparities by family SES, race, and gender persist in STEM education. Internationally, American students lag behind those in some countries with less economic resources. Explanations for group disparities within the U.S. and the mediocre international ranking of US student performance require more research, a task that is best accomplished through interdisciplinary approaches.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alexander KL, Entwisle DR, Bedinger SD. When expectations work: race and socioeconomic differences in school performance. Soc Psychol Q. 1994;57(4):283–99.
    1. Allen WR. The color of success: African-American college student outcomes at predominantly White and historically Black public colleges and universities. Harvard Educ Rev. 1992;62(1):26–45.
    1. Alon S, DiPrete TA. Orientation vs behavior: gender differences in field of study choice set. Columbia University; 2013. (Work. Pap.). Available at: http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac:166692. - PubMed
    1. Archer L, DeWitt J, Osborne J, Dillon J, Willis Beatrice, Wong B. Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: how families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. Amer Educ Res J. 2012;49(5):881–908.
    1. Aronson J, McGlone MS. Stereotype and social identity threat. In: Nelson TD, editor. The Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2008. pp. 153–78.