Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 6:3:116.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2015.00116. eCollection 2015.

Incidence of Platelet Dysfunction by Thromboelastography-Platelet Mapping in Children Supported with ECMO: A Pilot Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Incidence of Platelet Dysfunction by Thromboelastography-Platelet Mapping in Children Supported with ECMO: A Pilot Retrospective Study

Arun Saini et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Bleeding complications are common and decrease the odds of survival in children supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The role of platelet dysfunction on ECMO-induced coagulopathy and resultant bleeding complications is not well understood. The primary objective of this pilot study was to determine the incidence and magnitude of platelet dysfunction according to thromboelastography (TEG(®))-platelet mapping (PM) testing.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of children <18 years old who required ECMO at a tertiary level hospital. We collected TEG(®)-PM and conventional coagulation tests data. We also collected demographic, medications, blood products administered, and clinical outcome data. We defined severe platelet dysfunction as <50% aggregation in response to an agonist.

Results: We identified 24 out of 46 children on ECMO, who had TEG(®)-PM performed during the study period. We found the incidence of severe bleeding was 42% and mortality was 54% in our study cohort. In all samples measured, severe qualitative platelet dysfunction was more common for adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-mediated aggregation (92%) compared to arachidonic acid (AA)-mediated aggregation (75%) (p = 0.001). Also, ADP-mediated percent of platelet aggregation was significant lower than AA-mediated platelet aggregation [15% (interquartile range, IQR 2.8-48) vs. 49% (IQR 22-82.5), p < 0.001]. There was no difference in kaolin-activated heparinase TEG(®) parameters between the bleeding group and the non-bleeding group. Only absolute platelet count and TEG(®)-PM had increased predictive value on receiver operating characteristics analyses for severe bleeding and mortality compared to activated clotting time.

Conclusion: We found frequent and severe qualitative platelet dysfunction on TEG(®)-PM testing in children on ECMO. Larger studies are needed to determine if the assessment of qualitative platelet function by TEG(®)-PM can improve prediction of bleeding complications for children on ECMO.

Keywords: ECMO; ECMO-induced coagulopathy; anticoagulation; heparin; platelet dysfunction; platelet mapping; thromboelastography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A,B) Correlation of platelet aggregation and platelet count.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operator curve analyses for hemostatic parameters to predict severe bleeding. On ROC analyses (n = 24), we found that the AUC for ACT was lowest at 0.56 (0.39–0.75, p = 0.42) and platelet count was 0.61 (0.45–0.78, p = 0.16). The AUC for ADP-mediated platelet aggregation 0.64 (0.48–0.79, p = 0.11) and AA-mediated platelet aggregation 0.68 (0.53–0.83, *p = 0.03).*p < 0.05 considered significant.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operator curve analyses for hemostatic parameters to predict mortality. On ROC analyses (n = 24), we found that the AUC for ACT (0.51, 0.35–0.67, p = 0.9) was the lowest compared to quantitative platelet count (0.73, 0.59–0.86, *p = 0.004) and TEG®–PM parameters of qualitative platelet function [ADP-mediated platelet aggregation (0.67, 0.52–0.8, *p = 0.03) and AA-mediated platelet aggregation (0.65, 0.50–0.80, p = 0.06)]. *p < 0.05 considered significant.

References

    1. Paden ML, Conrad SA, Rycus PT, Thiagarajan RR, Registry E. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry report 2012. ASAIO J (2013) 59(3):202–10.10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182904a52 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dalton HJ, Garcia-Filion P, Holubkov R, Moler FW, Shanley T, Heidemann S, et al. Association of bleeding and thrombosis with outcome in extracorporeal life support*. Pediatr Crit Care Med (2015) 16(2):167–74.10.1097/PCC.0000000000000317 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saini A, Spinella PC. Management of anticoagulation and hemostasis for pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Lab Med (2014) 34(3):655–73.10.1016/j.cll.2014.06.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bembea MM, Schwartz JM, Shah N, Colantuoni E, Lehmann CU, Kickler T, et al. Anticoagulation monitoring during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J (2013) 59(1):63–8.10.1097/MAT.0b013e318279854a - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bembea MM, Annich G, Rycus P, Oldenburg G, Berkowitz I, Pronovost P. Variability in anticoagulation management of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an international survey. Pediatr Crit Care Med (2013) 14(2):e77–84.10.1097/PCC.0b013e31827127e4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources