Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb;43(2 Suppl 1):S18-27.
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000283.

School-Based Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening: Review and Programmatic Guidance

Affiliations
Review

School-Based Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening: Review and Programmatic Guidance

Felicia M T Lewis et al. Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

School-based sexually transmitted disease (STD) screening (SBSS) was designed to provide chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, treatment, and counseling to adolescents in a school setting to overcome some of the difficulties of screening in this population. To inform STD control programs and other entities on decision making about potentially implementing this intervention, we reviewed existing published and gray literature on SBSS from 1998 to 2014. Although they are work-intensive to establish, school-based STD screening programs are a feasible and cost-effective way of testing large numbers of male and female adolescents for chlamydia and gonorrhea, and to provide counseling and treatment to almost all those who are found infected. School-based STD screening programs do not seem to reduce prevalence in either the school or the general adolescent population, although there are currently relatively few studies on large-scale SBSS. More research in this field is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012 STD Surveillance Report. 2012.
    1. Newacheck P, Hung Y, Park M, et al. Disparities in adolescent health and health care: does socioeconomic status matter? Health Serv Res. 2003; 38:1235–1252. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fiscus LC, Ford CA, Miller WC. Infrequency of sexually transmitted disease screening among sexually experienced U.S. female adolescents. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004; 36:233–238. - PubMed
    1. Heijne JC, Tao G, Kent CK, et al. Uptake of regular Chlamydia testing by U.S. women: A longitudinal study. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 39: 243–250. - PubMed
    1. Chow JM, de Bocanegra HT, Hulett D, et al. Comparison of adherence to chlamydia screening guidelines among Title X providers and non–Title X providers in the California Family Planning, Access, Care, and Treatment Program. J Womens Health. 2012; 21:837–842. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms