Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 18;2016(1):CD003067.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub4.

Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents

Anneli Ahovuo-Saloranta  1 , Helena Forss, Anne Hiiri, Anne Nordblad, Marjukka Mäkelä
Affiliations

Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents

Anneli Ahovuo-Saloranta et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Most of the detected increment in dental caries among children and adolescents is confined to occlusal surfaces of posterior permanent molars. Dental sealants and fluoride varnishes are much used preventive options for caries. Although the effectiveness of sealants and fluoride varnishes for controlling caries as compared with no intervention has been demonstrated in clinical trials and summarised in systematic reviews, the relative effectiveness of these two interventions remains unclear. This review is an update of one first published in 2006 and last updated in 2010.

Objectives: Primary objective • To evaluate the relative effectiveness of fissure sealants compared with fluoride varnishes, or fissure sealants together with fluoride varnishes compared with fluoride varnishes alone, for preventing dental caries in the occlusal surfaces of permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Secondary objectives • To evaluate whether effectiveness is influenced by sealant material type and length of follow-up.• To document and report on data concerning adverse events associated with sealants and fluoride varnishes.

Search methods: We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 18 December 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2015, Issue 11), MEDLINE via Ovid (1946 to 18 December 2015) and EMBASE via Ovid (1980 to 18 December 2015). We also searched the US National Institutes of Health Trials Register (http://clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials. We placed no restrictions on language or date of publication when searching electronic databases. We screened the reference lists of identified trials and review articles for additional relevant studies.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials with at least 12 months of follow-up comparing fissure sealants, or fissure sealants together with fluoride varnishes, versus fluoride varnishes for preventing caries in the occlusal surfaces of permanent premolar or molar teeth, in participants younger than 20 years of age at the start of the study.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. We attempted to contact study authors to obtain missing or unclear information.We grouped and analysed studies on the basis of sealant material type (resin-based sealant and glass ionomer-based sealant: glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer) and different follow-up periods. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) for caries or no caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molar teeth. For trials with a split-mouth design, we used the Becker-Balagtas odds ratio. For continuous outcomes and data, we used means and standard deviations to obtain mean differences. We presented all measures with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).We assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methods.We conducted meta-analysis using the fixed-effect model, as data from only two studies were combined. We had planned to conduct meta-analyses using a random-effects model when more than three trials were included in the meta-analysis.

Main results: In this review, we included eight trials with 1746 participants (four of the trials were new since the 2010 update). Seven trials (1127 participants) contributed to the analyses, and children involved were five to 10 years of age at the start of the trial. Sealant versus fluoride varnish Resin-based fissure sealants compared with fluoride varnishes Four trials evaluated this comparison (three of them contributing to the analyses). Compared with fluoride varnish, resin-based sealants prevented more caries in first permanent molars at two-year follow-up (two studies in the meta-analysis with pooled odds ratio (OR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.94; P value = 0.02; I(2) = 0%; 358 children evaluated). We assessed the body of evidence as low quality. The caries-preventive benefit for sealants was maintained at longer follow-up in one trial at high risk of bias: 26.6% of sealant teeth and 55.8% of fluoride-varnished teeth had developed caries when 75 children were evaluated at nine years of follow-up. Glass ionomer-based sealants compared with fluoride varnishes Three trials evaluated this comparison: one trial with chemically cured glass ionomer and two with resin-modified glass ionomer. Researchers reported similar caries increment between study groups regardless of which glass ionomer material was used in a trial. Study designs were clinically diverse, and meta-analysis could not be conducted. The body of evidence was assessed as of very low quality. Sealant together with fluoride varnish versus fluoride varnish alone One split-mouth trial analysing 92 children at two-year follow-up found a significant difference in favour of resin-based fissure sealant together with fluoride varnish compared with fluoride varnish only (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.55). The body of evidence was assessed as low quality. Adverse events Three trials (two with resin-based sealant material and one with resin-modified glass ionomer) reported that no adverse events resulted from use of sealants or fluoride varnishes. The other five studies did not mention adverse events.

Authors' conclusions: Currently, scarce and clinically diverse data are available on the comparison of sealants and fluoride varnish applications; therefore it is not possible to draw clear conclusions about possible differences in effectiveness for preventing or controlling dental caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars. The conclusions of this updated review remain the same as those of the last update (in 2010). We found some low-quality evidence suggesting the superiority of resin-based fissure sealants over fluoride varnish applications for preventing occlusal caries in permanent molars, and other low-quality evidence for benefits of resin-based sealant and fluoride varnish over fluoride varnish alone. Regarding glass ionomer sealant versus fluoride varnish comparisons, we assessed the quality of the evidence as very low and could draw no conclusions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Anneli Ahovuo‐Saloranta: none known. Helena Forss: none known. Anne Hiiri: none known. Anne Nordblad: none known. Marjukka Mäkelä: no competing interests.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram
2
2
'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies
3
3
'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Resin fissure sealant versus fluoride varnish, Outcome 1 Caries at 23 to 24 months (yes/no).
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Resin fissure sealant versus fluoride varnish, Outcome 2 Caries at 4 years (yes/no).
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Resin fissure sealant versus fluoride varnish, Outcome 3 Caries at 9 years (yes/no).
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Resin‐modified glass ionomer fissure sealant versus fluoride varnish, Outcome 1 Caries at 12 months (yes/no).
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Resin fissure sealant plus fluoride varnish versus fluoride varnish, Outcome 1 Caries at 24 months (yes/no).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Comment in

References

References to studies included in this review

Bravo 2005 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Bravo M, Baca P, Llodra JC, Osorio E. A 24‐month study comparing sealant and fluoride varnish in caries reduction on different permanent first molar surfaces. Journal of Public Health Dentistry 1997;57(3):184‐6. - PubMed
    1. Bravo M, Garcia‐Anllo I, Baca P, Llodra JC. A 48‐month survival analysis comparing sealant (Delton) with fluoride varnish (Duraphat) in 6‐ to 8‐year‐old children. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1997;25(3):247‐50. - PubMed
    1. Bravo M, Garcia‐Anllo I, Baca P, Llodra JC, Junco P. Effectiveness of fissure sealant and fluoride varnish on different tooth surfaces: a 48‐month study [Estudio comparativo sobre la efectividad de sellador de fisuras y bariz de fluor en distintas superficies dentarias: Ensayo comunitario a 48 meses]. Archivos de Odontoestomatologia Preventiva y Comunitaria 1996;12:717‐23.
    1. Bravo M, Llodra JC, Baca P, Osorio E. Effectiveness of visible light fissure sealant (Delton) versus fluoride varnish (Duraphat): 24‐month clinical trial. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1996;24(1):42‐6. - PubMed
    1. Bravo M, Montero J, Bravo JJ, Baca P, Llodra JC. Sealant and fluoride varnish in caries: a randomized trial. Journal of Dental Research 2005;84(12):1138‐43. - PubMed
Florio 2001 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Florio FM, Pereira AC, Meneghim Mde C, Ramacciato JC. Evaluation of non‐invasive treatment applied to occlusal surfaces. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children 2001;68(5‐6):326‐31, 301. - PubMed
Ji 2007 {published data only}
    1. Ji PH, Xu QL, Ba Y. Clinical evaluation of fluor protector and glass‐ionomer cement used as pit and fissure sealant for preventing pit and fissure caries in children. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2007;16(4):374‐6. - PubMed
Liu 2012 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Liu BY, Lo ECM, Chu CH, Lin HC. Randomized trial on fluorides and sealants for fissure caries prevention. Journal of Dental Research 2012;91(8):753‐8. - PubMed
Raadal 1984 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Raadal M, Laegreid O, Laegreid KV, Hveem H, Korsgaard EK, Wangen K. Fissure sealing of permanent first molars in children receiving a high standard of prophylactic care. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1984;12(2):65‐8. - PubMed
Salem 2014 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Salem K, Shaahsavari F, Kazemnejad E, Poorhabibi Z. Pit and fissure sealant versus fluoride varnish in prevention of occlusal caries. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Pathology and Surgery 2014;2(4):37‐47.
Splieth 2001 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Splieth C, Förster M, Meyer G. Additional caries protection by sealing permanent first molars compared to fluoride varnish applications in children with low caries prevalence: 2‐year results. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2001;2(3):133‐8.
Tagliaferro 2011 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Tagliaferro EP, Pardi V, Ambrosano GM, Meneghim Mde C, Silva SR, Pereira AC. Occlusal caries prevention in high and low risk schoolchildren. A clinical trial. American Journal of Dentistry 2011;24(2):109‐14. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

de Oliveira 2013 {published data only}
    1. Oliveira DC, Cunha RF. Comparison of the caries‐preventive effect of a glass ionomer sealant and fluoride varnish on newly erupted first permanent molars of children with and without dental caries experience. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 2013;71:972‐7. - PubMed
Fischman 1977 {published data only}
    1. Fischman SL, English JA, Albino JE, Bissell GD, Greenberg JS, Juliano DB, et al. A comprehensive caries control program‐design and evaluation of the clinical trial. Journal of Dental Research 1977;56 Spec No:C99‐103. - PubMed
Hita 2007 {published data only}
    1. Hita Iglesias C, Prados Atienza MB, Bravo M, Prados Sánchez E, Muñoz Soto E, González Rodríguez MP. Impact of public preventive programmes on oral quality of life of 11 to 12‐yr‐old school students. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal 2007;12:E408‐11. - PubMed
    1. Prados‐Atienza MB, Bravo M, Muñoz Soto E, González Rodríguez MP, Prados‐Sánchez E. Effectiveness of fissure sealant and fluoride varnish on different tooth surfaces: a 24‐month field trial [Efectividad de selladores de fisuras más barniz de fluor en distintas superficies dentarias: ensaqo de campo a 24 meses]. R.O.E. Revista del Consejo de Odontológos y Estomatólogos 2002;7(2):167‐74.
Jaworska 1984 {published data only}
    1. Jaworska D. Possibilities of preventing fissure caries of first molars in children 6 to 7 years of age. Annales Academiae Medicae Stetinensis 1984;30:281‐93. - PubMed
Källestål 2005 {published data only}
    1. Källestål C. The effect of five years' implementation of caries‐preventive methods in Swedish high‐risk adolescents. Caries Research 2005;39(1):20‐6. - PubMed
Petterson 1983 {published data only}
    1. Petterson E, Pettersson M, Olofsson IL, Ogeman B. Does fissure sealing of the 6th year molars add to the preventive measures of fluoride application? [Har fissurförsegling på 6‐ärsmolarer en försvarbar tilläggseffect utöver fluorlackning?]. Tandläkartidningen 1983;75(9):497‐9. - PubMed
Raadal 1990 {published data only}
    1. Raadal M, Laegreid O, Laegreid KV, Hveem H, Wangen K. Evaluation of a routine for prevention and treatment of fissure caries in permanent first molars. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1990;18(2):70‐3. - PubMed
Riethe 1977 {published data only}
    1. Riethe P, Streib W, Schubring G. Clinical studies of Nuva Seal, Epoxylite 9070 and Fluor‐Protector [Klinische Untersuchungen mit Nuva Seal, Epoxylite 9070 und Fluor‐Protector]. Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 1977;32(11):853‐5. - PubMed
Saifullina 1990 {published data only}
    1. Saifullina KhM, El'darusheva ZA. The effectiveness of preventing caries in the first permanent molars [Effektivnost' profilaktiki kariesa pervykh postoiannykh moliarov]. Stomatologiia 1990;69(6):67‐9. - PubMed
Uma 2011 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Uma SR, Shankar AMR, Arunadevi M, Naganandini S. Comparison of caries preventive effectiveness of fissure sealant and fluoride varnish. Archives of Oral Sciences and Research 2011;1(4):198‐204.

References to ongoing studies

ISRCTN17029222 {published data only}
    1. A randomised trial to determine the relative cost and effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants and fluoride varnish in preventing dental decay. - PMC - PubMed
ISRCTN81071356 {published data only}
    1. The effectiveness of fluoride varnish versus pit and fissure sealant for the prevention of caries in children of primary health care.

Additional references

ADA 2003
    1. American Dental Association. Bisphenol A and dental materials. http://www.ada.org/1766.aspx (accessed December 2014).
Ahovuo 2013
    1. Ahovuo‐Saloranta A, Forss H, Walsh T, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M, Worthington H. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub4] - DOI - PubMed
Arenholt 1999
    1. Arenholt‐Bindslev D, Breinholt V, Preiss A, Schmalz G. Time‐related bisphenol‐A content and estrogenic activity in saliva samples collected in relation to placement of fissure sealants. Clinical Oral Investigations 1999;3:120‐5. - PubMed
Azarpazhooh 2008a
    1. Azarpazhooh A, Main PA. Fluoride varnish in the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 2008;74:73‐9. - PubMed
Azarpazhooh 2008b
    1. Azarpazhooh A, Main PA. Is there a risk of harm or toxicity in the placement of pit and fissure sealant materials? A systematic review. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 2008;74(2):179‐83. - PubMed
Bader 2004
    1. Bader JD, Shugars DA. A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. The Journal of the American Dental Association 2004;135(10):1413‐26. - PubMed
Bagramian 2009
    1. Bagramian RA, Garcia‐Godoy F, Volpe AR. The global increase in dental caries. A pending public health crisis. American Journal of Dentistry 2009;22:3‐8. - PubMed
Batchelor 2004
    1. Batchelor PA, Sheiham A. Grouping of tooth surfaces by susceptibility to caries: a study in 5–16 year‐old children. BMC Oral Health 2004;4:2. - PMC - PubMed
Bawden 1998
    1. Bawden JW. Fluoride varnish: a useful new tool for public health dentistry. Journal of Public Health Dentistry 1998;58(4):266‐9. - PubMed
Brown 1995
    1. Brown LJ, Selwitz RH. The impact of recent changes in the epidemiology of dental caries on guidelines for the use of dental sealants. Journal of Public Health Dentistry 1995;55(5 Spec No):274‐91. - PubMed
Chokkalingam 1998
    1. Chokkalingam A, Scherer R, Dickersin K. Agreement of data in abstracts compared to full publications. Controlled Clinical Trials 1998;19:S61‐2.
Chu 2006
    1. Chu CH, Lo ECM. A review of sodium fluoride varnish. General Dentistry 2006;54(4):247‐53. - PubMed
Curtin 2002
    1. Curtin F, Elbourne D, Altman DG. Meta‐analysis combining parallel and cross‐over clinical trials. II: binary outcomes. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21(15):2145‐59. - PubMed
Dorri 2015
    1. Dorri M, Dunne SM, Walsh T, Schwendicke F. Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010431.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Ekstrand 1980
    1. Ekstrand J, Koch G, Petersson LG. Plasma fluoride concentration and urinary fluoride excretion in children following application of the fluoride‐containing varnish Duraphat. Caries Research 1980;14:185‐9. - PubMed
Ekstrand 2012
    1. Ekstrand K, Martignon S, Bakhshandeh A, Ricketts DNJ. The non‐operative resin treatment of proximal caries lesions. Dental Update 2012;39:614‐22. - PubMed
Fleisch 2010
    1. Fleisch AF, Sheffield PE, Chinn C, Edelstein BL, Landrigan PJ. Bisphenol A and related compounds in dental materials. Pediatrics 2010;126(4):760‐8. - PMC - PubMed
GRADE 2004
    1. GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328(7454):1490. - PMC - PubMed
Griffin 2008
    1. Griffin SO, Oong E, Kohn W, Vidakovic B, Gooch BF, CDC Dental Sealant Systematic Review Work Group et al. The effectiveness of sealants in managing caries lesions. Journal of Dental Research 2008;87:169‐74. - PubMed
Helfenstein 1994
    1. Helfenstein U, Steiner M. Fluoride varnishes (Duraphat): a meta‐analysis. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1994;22(1):1‐5. - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011a
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Higgins 2011b
    1. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Hopewell 2006
    1. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Askie L. Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006;59(7):681‐4. - PubMed
ICDAS II 2008
    1. International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Coordinating Committee. ICDAS II International Caries Assessment and Detection System. www.icdas.org/assets/downloads/Appendix.pdf (accessed August 2015).
Isaksson 1993
    1. Isaksson M, Bruze M, Björkner B, Niklasson B. Contact allergy to Duraphat. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1993;101:49‐51. - PubMed
Joskow 2006
    1. Joskow R, Boyd Barr D, Barr JR, Calafat AM, Needham LL, Rubin C. Exposure to bisphenol A from bis‐glycidyl dimethacrylate‐based dental sealants. The Journal of the American Dental Association 2006;137:353‐62. - PubMed
Llodra 1993
    1. Llodra J, Bravo M, Delgado‐Rodriquez M, Baca P, Galvez R. Factors influencing the effectiveness of sealants: a meta‐analysis. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1993;21(5):261‐8. - PubMed
Marinho 2013
    1. Marinho VCC, Worthington HV, Walsh T, Clarkson JE. Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002279.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
McComb 2001
    1. McComb D, Tam LE. Diagnosis of occlusal caries: Part I. Conventional methods. Journal of Canadian Dental Association 2001;67(8):454‐7. - PubMed
McDonald 1992
    1. McDonald SP, Sheiham A. The distribution of caries on different tooth surfaces at varying levels of caries ‐ a compilation of data from 18 previous studies. Community Dental Health 1992;9(1):39‐48. - PubMed
Mejàre 2003
    1. Mejàre I, Lingström P, Petersson LG, Holm AK, Twetman S, Källestål C, et al. Caries‐preventive effect of fissure sealants: a systematic review. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 2003;61:321‐30. - PubMed
Neusser 2014
    1. Neusser S, Krauth C, Hussein R, Bitzer EM. Clinical effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of fissure sealants in children and adolescents with a high caries risk [Molarenversiegelung als Kariesprophylaxe bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit hohem Kariesrisiko]. GMS Health Technology Assessment 2014;10(Doc2). [10.3205/hta000118, URN:urn:nbn:de:0183‐hta0001180] - PMC - PubMed
Nicholson 2007
    1. Nicholson JW. Polyacid‐modified composite resins ("compomers") and their use in clinical dentistry. Dental Materials 2007;23(5):615‐22. - PubMed
Petersen 2005
    1. Petersen PE. Sociobehavioural risk factors in dental caries ‐ international perspectives. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 2005;33:274‐9. - PubMed
Petersson 1993
    1. Petersson LG. Fluoride mouthrinses and fluoride varnishes. Caries Research 1993;27 Suppl 1:35‐42. - PubMed
Petersson 2004
    1. Petersson LG, Twetman S, Dahlgren H, Norlund A, Holm AK, Nordenram G, et al. Professional fluoride varnish treatment for caries control: a systematic review of clinical trials. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 2004;62:170‐6. - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Ripa 1993
    1. Ripa LW. Sealants revised: an update of the effectiveness of pit‐and‐fissure sealants. Caries Research 1993;27 Suppl 1:77‐82. - PubMed
Ruse 1999
    1. Ruse ND. What is a "compomer"?. Journal of Canadian Dental Association 1999;65(9):500‐4. - PubMed
Schmalz 1999
    1. Schmalz G, Preiss A, Arenholt‐Bindslev D. Bisphenol‐A content of resin monomers and related degradation products. Clinical Oral Investigations 1999;3(3):144‐9. - PubMed
Seppä 1999
    1. Seppä L. Efficacy and safety of fluoride varnishes. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 1999;20(1 Suppl):18‐26. - PubMed
Shellis 1994
    1. Shellis RP, Duckworth RM. Studies on the cariostatic mechanisms of fluoride. International Dental Journal 1994;44:263‐73. - PubMed
Sköld‐Larsson 2000
    1. Sköld‐Larsson K, Modeer T, Twetman S. Fluoride concentration in plaque in adolescents after topical application of different fluoride varnishes. Clinical Oral Investigations 2000;4(1):31‐4. - PubMed
Splieth 2010
    1. Splieth CH, Ekstrand KR, Alkilzy M, Clarkson J, Meyer‐Lueckel H, Martignon S et.al. Sealants in dentistry: outcomes of the ORCA Saturday Afternoon Symposium 2007. Caries Research 2010;44(1):3‐13. - PubMed
Stedman 2011
    1. Stedman MR, Curtin F, Elbourne DR, Kesselheim AS, Brookhart MA. Meta‐analyses involving cross‐over trials: methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology 2011;40(6):1732‐4. - PubMed
Sterne 2011
    1. Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D (editors). Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Ten Cate 1997
    1. Cate JM. Review on fluoride, with special emphasis on calcium fluoride mechanisms in caries prevention. European Journal of Oral Sciences 1997;105:461‐5. - PubMed
Twetman 2013
    1. Twetman S, Axelsson S, Dahlen G, Espelid I, Mejàre I, Norlund A, et al. Adjunct methods for caries detection: a systematic review of literature. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 2013;71:388‐97. - PubMed
Whelton 2004
    1. Whelton H. Overview of the impact of changing global patterns of dental caries experience on caries clinical trials. Journal of Dental Research 2004;83(Spec Iss No C):C29‐34. - PubMed
WHO 2003
    1. World Health Organization. World Oral Health Report 2003. Figure 5: Dental caries levels (DMFT) of 12‐year‐olds worldwide. http://www.who.int/oral_health/media/en/orh_report03_en.pdf (accessed December 2014).
Worthington 2015
    1. Worthington H, Clarkson J, Weldon J. Priority oral health research identification for clinical decision‐making. Evidence‐based Dentistry 2015;16(3):69‐71. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Hiiri 2006
    1. Hiiri A, Ahovuo‐Saloranta A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M. Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Hiiri 2010
    1. Hiiri A, Ahovuo‐Saloranta A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M. Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub3] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms