Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;111(6):1011-20.
doi: 10.1111/add.13313. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

Therapist and client discussions of drinking and coping: a sequential analysis of therapy dialogues in three evidence-based alcohol use disorder treatments

Molly Magill  1 , Justin Walthers  1 , Nadine R Mastroleo  1 , Jacques Gaume  1   2 , Richard Longabaugh  1 , Timothy R Apodaca  3   4
Affiliations

Therapist and client discussions of drinking and coping: a sequential analysis of therapy dialogues in three evidence-based alcohol use disorder treatments

Molly Magill et al. Addiction. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background and aims: Research into the active ingredients of behavioral interventions for alcohol use disorders (AUD) has focused upon treatment-specific factors, often yielding disappointing results. The present study examines common factors of change in motivational enhancement therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy and 12-Step facilitation therapy by (1) estimating transitional probabilities between therapist behaviors and subsequent client Change (CT) and Sustain (ST) Talk and (2) examining therapist skillfulness as a potential predictor of transition probability magnitude.

Design: Secondary data analysis examined temporal associations in therapy dialogues.

Setting: United States: data were from Project MATCH (Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Homogeneity) (1997).

Participants: One hundred and twenty-six participants who received motivational enhancement therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy or 12-Step facilitation therapy.

Measurements: Therapist behaviors were measured in three categories (exploring, teaching, connecting) and client statements included five categories (CT-distal, ST-distal, CT-proximal, ST-proximal, neutral). Therapist skillfulness was measured using a five-point ordinal scale.

Findings: Relative to chance, therapist exploratory behaviors predicted subsequent client discussion of distal, drinking behavior [odds ratio (OR) = 1.37-1.78, P < 0.001] while suppressing discussion of proximal coping and neutral content (OR = 0.83-0.90, P < 0.01). Unexpectedly, therapist teaching suppressed distal drinking language (OR = 0.48-0.53, P < 0.001) and predicted neutral content (OR = 1.45, P < 0.001). Connecting behaviors increased both drinking and coping language, particularly language in favor of change (CT OR = 1.15-1.84, P < 0.001). Analyses of exploring and connecting skillfulness revealed that high skillfulness maximized these behaviors effect on client responses, but not teaching skillfulness.

Conclusions: In motivational enhancement therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and 12-Step facilitation therapy for alcohol use disorders, the therapists who explore and connect with clients appear to be more successful at eliciting discussion about change than therapists who engage in teaching behavior. Therapists who are more skilled achieve better results than those who are less skilled.

Keywords: Alcohol treatment; active ingredients; change talk; mechanisms of behavior change; process research; sequential analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for therapist-to-client transitions
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Moos R, Finney J. The expanding scope of alcoholism treatment evaluation. American Psychologist. 1983;38(10):1036–44. - PubMed
    1. Longabaugh R, Magill M, Morgenstern J, Huebner R. Mechanisms of behavior change in treatment for alcohol and other drug use disorders. In: McCrady BS, Epstein EE, editors. Addictions: A comprehensive guidebook. 2. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2013.
    1. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH Posttreatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1997;58(1):7–29. - PubMed
    1. Project MATCH Research Group. Project MATCH secondary a priori hypotheses. Addiction. 1997;92(12):1671–98. - PubMed
    1. Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW. Project MATCH hypotheses: Results and causal chain analyses. US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 2001.