Diagnosis of clinical and subclinical varicocele: how has it evolved?
- PMID: 26780869
- PMCID: PMC4770483
- DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.169991
Diagnosis of clinical and subclinical varicocele: how has it evolved?
Abstract
In this review, we examine the evolution and application of various diagnostic modalities for varicoceles starting with venography, scintigraphy, and thermography and their role in the evaluation of a varicocele patient. Some of these methods have been supplanted by less invasive and more easily performed diagnostic modalities, especially ultrasound and Doppler examination of the scrotum. Advances in ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging hold the potential to expand the role of imaging beyond that of visual confirmation and characterization of varicoceles. The ability to identify the early indicators of testicular dysfunction based on imaging findings may have implications for the management of varicoceles in the future.
Figures
References
-
- Ahlberg NE, Bartley O, Chidekel N, Fritjofsson A. Phlebography in varicocele scroti. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1966;4:517–28. - PubMed
-
- Masson P, Brannigan RE. The varicocele. Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41:129–44. - PubMed
-
- Jarow JP, Sharlip ID, Belker AM, Lipshultz LI, Sigman M, et al. Best practice policies for male infertility. J Urol. 2002;167:2138–44. - PubMed
-
- Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1556–60. - PubMed
-
- Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1970;21:606–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
