Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jan 18;6(1):e009189.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009189.

Assessment of the quality and content of national and international guidelines on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy using the AGREE II instrument

Alessandra N Bazzano  1 , Erik Green  2 , Anita Madison  2 , Andrew Barton  2 , Veronica Gillispie  3 , Lydia A L Bazzano  2
Affiliations
Review

Assessment of the quality and content of national and international guidelines on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy using the AGREE II instrument

Alessandra N Bazzano et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: High-quality evidence-based clinical practice guidelines can guide diagnosis and treatment to optimise outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality and content of national and international guidelines on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Data sources: The MEDLINE database, the National Guideline Clearinghouse and several international databases were searched for appropriate guidelines from the past 10 years.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Six guidelines met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument.

Results: A total of 695 records were identified and screened by two authors. Disorder definitions, classifications, preventive measures and treatment recommendations were evaluated and compared among guidelines. AGREE II results varied widely across domains and categories. Only two guidelines received consistently high ratings across domains and few demonstrated a high level of methodological rigour. Recommendations regarding classification and treatment were similar across guidelines, while assessment of preventive measures varied widely.

Conclusions: Clinical practice guidelines for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy vary significantly in quality and with respect to assessment of preventive measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram outlining the guideline selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Abalos E, et al. Preeclampsia, eclampsia and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a secondary analysis of the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. Bjog 2014;121:14–24. - PubMed
    1. Hutcheon JA, Lisonkova S, Joseph KS, Epidemiology of preeclampsia and the other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2011;25:391–403. - PubMed
    1. Lo JO, Mission JF, Caughey AB, Hypertensive disease of pregnancy and maternal mortality. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013;25:124–32. - PubMed
    1. Dolea C, AbouZahr C, Global burden of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the year 2000 in Evidence and Information for Policy. 2003, World Health Organization: Geneva.
    1. James PR, Nelson-Piercy C, Management of hypertension before, during, and after pregnancy. Heart 2004;90:6. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms