Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2016 Jan;64(1):22-30.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.13884.

Predictive Validity of the Beers and Screening Tool of Older Persons' Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) Criteria to Detect Adverse Drug Events, Hospitalizations, and Emergency Department Visits in the United States

Joshua D Brown  1   2 , Lisa C Hutchison  3 , Chenghui Li  1 , Jacob T Painter  1 , Bradley C Martin  1
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Predictive Validity of the Beers and Screening Tool of Older Persons' Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) Criteria to Detect Adverse Drug Events, Hospitalizations, and Emergency Department Visits in the United States

Joshua D Brown et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the predictive validity of the 2003 Beers, 2012 American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers, and Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Managed care administrative claims data from 2006 to 2009.

Participants: Commercially insured persons aged 65 and older in the United States (N=174,275).

Measurements: Association between adverse drug events (ADEs), emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalization outcomes and inappropriate medication use using time-varying Cox proportional hazard models. Measures of model discrimination (c-index) and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to compare unadjusted and adjusted models for associations.

Results: The prevalence of inappropriate prescribing was 34.1% for the 2012 AGS Beers criteria, 32.2% for the 2003 Beers criteria, and 27.6% for the STOPP criteria. Each set of criteria modestly discriminated ADEs in unadjusted analyses (STOPP criteria: hazard ratio (HR)=2.89, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.68-3.12, C-index=0.607; 2012 AGS Beers criteria: HR=2.51, 95% CI=2.33-2.70, C-index=0.603; 2003 Beers criteria: HR=2.65, 95% CI=2.46-2.85, C-index=0.605). Similar results were observed for ED visits and hospitalizations. The c-indices increased to between 0.65 and 0.70 in adjusted analyses. The kappa for agreement between criteria was 0.80 for the 2003 and 2012 AGS Beers criteria, 0.58 for the 2012 AGS Beers and STOPP criteria, and 0.59 for the 2003 Beers and STOPP criteria. For the three outcomes, the 2012 AGS Beers criteria had the highest sensitivity (61.2-71.2%) and the lowest specificity (41.2-70.7%), and the STOPP criteria had the lowest sensitivity (53.8-64.7%) but the highest specificity (47.8-78.1%).

Conclusion: All three criteria were modestly prognostic for ADEs, EDs, and hospitalizations, with the STOPP criteria slightly outperforming both Beers criteria. With low sensitivity, low specificity, and low agreement between the criteria, they can be used in a complementary fashion to enhance sensitivity in detecting ADEs.

Keywords: Beers criteria; STOPP criteria; adverse drug events; inappropriate prescribing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Checklist: Elements of Financial/Personal Conflicts JDB CL LCH JTP BCM Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Employment or Affiliation x x x x x Grants/Funds x x x x x Honoraria x x x x x Speaker Forum x x x x x Consultant x x x x x Stocks x x x x x Royalties x x x x x Expert Testimony x x x x x Board Member x x x x x Patents x x x x x Personal Relationship x x

References

    1. Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, Kennedy J, O’Mahony D. STOPP (screening tool of older person’s prescriptions) and START (screening tool to alert doctors to right treatment). consensus validation. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;46(2):72–83. - PubMed
    1. Laroche ML, Charmes JP, Nouaille Y, Picard N, Merle L. Is inappropriate medication use a major cause of adverse drug reactions in the elderly? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63(2):177–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02831.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spinewine A, Schmader KE, Barber N, et al. Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: How well can it be measured and optimised? Lancet. 2007;370(9582):173–184. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61091-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fillenbaum GG, Hanlon JT, Landerman LR, et al. Impact of inappropriate drug use on health services utilization among representative older community-dwelling residents. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2004;2(2):92–101. - PubMed
    1. Cahir C, Fahey T, Teeling M, Teljeur C, Feely J, Bennett K. Potentially inappropriate prescribing and cost outcomes for older people: A national population study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69(5):543–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03628.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types