Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 May;36(4):526-35.
doi: 10.1177/0272989X15625622. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

Risk Stratification and Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Paul C Schroy 3rd  1 , Emir Duhovic  1 , Clara A Chen  2 , Timothy C Heeren  3 , William Lopez  1 , Danielle L Apodaca  1 , John B Wong  4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Risk Stratification and Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Paul C Schroy 3rd et al. Med Decis Making. 2016 May.

Abstract

Background: Eliciting patient preferences within the context of shared decision making has been advocated for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, yet providers often fail to comply with patient preferences that differ from their own.

Purpose: To determine whether risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) influences provider willingness to comply with patient preferences when selecting a desired CRC screening option.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting/participants: Asymptomatic, average-risk patients due for CRC screening in an urban safety net health care setting.

Intervention: Patients were randomized 1:1 to a decision aid alone (n= 168) or decision aid plus risk assessment (n= 173) arm between September 2012 and September 2014.

Outcomes: The primary outcome was concordance between patient preference and test ordered; secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction with the decision-making process, screening intentions, test completion rates, and provider satisfaction.

Results: Although providers perceived risk stratification to be useful in selecting an appropriate screening test for their average-risk patients, no significant differences in concordance were observed between the decision aid alone and decision aid plus risk assessment groups (88.1% v. 85.0%,P= 0.40) or high- and low-risk groups (84.5% v. 87.1%,P= 0.51). Concordance was highest for colonoscopy and relatively low for tests other than colonoscopy, regardless of study arm or risk group. Failure to comply with patient preferences was negatively associated with satisfaction with the decision-making process, screening intentions, and test completion rates.

Limitations: Single-institution setting; lack of provider education about the utility of risk stratification into their decision making.

Conclusions: Providers perceived risk stratification to be useful in their decision making but often failed to comply with patient preferences for tests other than colonoscopy, even among those deemed to be at low risk of ACN.

Keywords: provider decision making; randomized trial methodology; risk stratification; shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104–17. - PubMed
    1. Pignone M, Saha S, Hoerger T, Mandelblatt J. Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):96–104. - PubMed
    1. CDC Vital Signs: Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Use-United States, 2012. MMWR. 2013:621–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–37. - PubMed
    1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous Polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(3):130–60. - PubMed

Publication types