The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument
- PMID: 26786084
- PMCID: PMC4900032
- DOI: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument
Abstract
Background: COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is an initiative of an international multidisciplinary team of researchers who aim to improve the selection of outcome measurement instruments both in research and in clinical practice by developing tools for selecting the most appropriate available instrument.
Method: In this paper these tools are described, i.e. the COSMIN taxonomy and definition of measurement properties; the COSMIN checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties; a search filter for finding studies on measurement properties; a protocol for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; a database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; and a guideline for selecting outcome measurement instruments for Core Outcome Sets in clinical trials. Currently, we are updating the COSMIN checklist, particularly the standards for content validity studies. Also new standards for studies using Item Response Theory methods will be developed. Additionally, in the future we want to develop standards for studies on the quality of non-patient reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcomes and performance-based outcomes.
Conclusions: In summary, we plea for more standardization in the use of outcome measurement instruments, for conducting high quality systematic reviews on measurement instruments in which the best available outcome measurement instrument is recommended, and for stopping the use of poor outcome measurement instruments.
Figures
References
-
- Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(1):2–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ioannidis JP, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):166–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mills RJ, Young CA, Pallant JF, Tennant A. Development of a patient reported outcome scale for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: The Neurological Fatigue Index (NFI-MS) Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8(1):22–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-22 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chren MM, Lasek RJ, Quinn LM, Mostow EN, Zyzanski SJ. Skindex, a quality-of-life measure for patients with skin disease: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Invest Dermatol. 1996;107(5):707–713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12365600 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources