Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 21;37(28):2276-86.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv701. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

Aortic valve surgery and survival in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction

Affiliations

Aortic valve surgery and survival in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction

Zainab Samad et al. Eur Heart J. .

Abstract

Aims: We aimed to determine the frequency of aortic valve surgery (AVR) with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), among patients with moderate/severe aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), and its relationship with survival.

Methods and results: The Duke Echocardiographic Database (N = 132 804) was queried for patients with mean gradient ≥25 mmHg and/or peak velocity ≥3 m/s and LVSD (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50%) from 1 January 1995-28 February 2014. For analyses purposes, AS was defined both by mean gradient and calculated aortic valve area (AVA) criteria. Time-dependent indicators of AVR in multivariable Cox models were used to assess the relationship of AVR and all-cause mortality. A total of 1634 patients had moderate (N = 1090, 67%) or severe (N = 544, 33%) AS by mean gradient criteria. Overall, 287 (26%) patients with moderate AS and 263 (48%) patients with severe AS underwent AVR within 5 years of the qualifying echo. There were 863 (53%) deaths observed up to 5 years following index echo. After multivariable adjustment in an inverse probability weighted regression model, AVR was associated with higher 5-year survival amongst patients with moderate AS and severe AS whether classified by AVA or mean gradient criteria. Over all, AVR ± CABG compared with medical therapy was associated with significantly lower mortality [hazard ratio, HR = 0.49 (0.38, 0.62), P < 0.0001]. Compared with CABG alone, CABG + AVR was associated with better survival [HR = 0.18 (0.12, 0.27), P < 0.0001].

Conclusions: In patients with moderate/severe AS and LVSD, mortality is substantial and amongst those selected for surgery, AVR with or without CABG is associated with higher survival. Research is required to understand factors contributing to current practice patterns and the possible utility of transcatheter approaches in this high-risk cohort.

Keywords: Moderate aortic stenosis; aortic valve surgery; left ventricular systolic dysfunction; severe aortic stenosis; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Use of aortic valve surgery among entire cohort by aortic stenosis severity is described on the left of the vertical bar and by severity of left ventricular systolic dysfunction on the right. Aortic stenosis severity is defined by mean gradients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative incidence of aortic valve surgery by aortic stenosis severity and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival curves stratified by aortic valve surgery.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Multivariate and propensity adjusted models examining the impact of aortic valve surgery on survival. All P < 0.001; analysis includes patients with mean aortic valve gradients ≥25 mmHg.
Figure A1
Figure A1
Adjusted product limit survival estimates of patients with moderate aortic stenosis and left ventricular systolic dysfunction and no known coronary artery disease stratified by aortic valve surgery. Aortic stenosis is defined by mean gradient criteria.
Figure A2
Figure A2
Adjusted product-limit survival estimates of patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular systolic dysfunction and no known coronary artery disease stratified by aortic valve surgery. Aortic stenosis is defined by mean gradient criteria.
Figure A3
Figure A3
Adjusted product-limit survival estimates of patients with AVA > 1.0 cm2 and left ventricular systolic dysfunction stratified by aortic valve surgery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rankin JS, Hammill BG, Ferguson TB Jr, Glower DD, O'Brien SM, DeLong ER, Peterson ED, Edwards FH. Determinants of operative mortality in valvular heart surgery. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:547–557. - PubMed
    1. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Levang OW, Tornos P, Vanoverschelde JL, Vermeer F, Boersma E, Ravaud P, Vahanian A. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The euro heart survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1231–1243. - PubMed
    1. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA, O'Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM III, Thomas JD, Members AATF. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:e521–e643. - PubMed
    1. Ross J., Jr Afterload mismatch in aortic and mitral valve disease: implications for surgical therapy. J Am College Cardiol 1985;5:811–826. - PubMed
    1. Wisenbaugh T, Booth D, DeMaria A, Nissen S, Waters J. Relationship of contractile state to ejection performance in patients with chronic aortic valve disease. Circulation. 1986;73:47–53. - PubMed