Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:2015:976756.
doi: 10.1155/2015/976756. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

Clinical Management of a Peri-Implant Giant Cell Granuloma

Affiliations

Clinical Management of a Peri-Implant Giant Cell Granuloma

A Pacifici et al. Case Rep Dent. 2015.

Abstract

Purpose. Implant therapy plays an important role in contemporary dentistry with high rates of long-term success. However, in recent years, the incidence of peri-implantitis and implant failures has significantly increased. The peripheral giant cell granuloma (PGCG) rarely occurs in peri-implant tissues and it is clinically comparable to the lesions associated with natural teeth. Therefore, the study of possible diseases associated with dental implants plays an important role in order to be able to diagnose and treat these conditions. Materials and Methods. This report described a 60-year-old Caucasian male who presented a reddish-purple pedunculated mass, of about 2 cm in diameter, associated with a dental implant and the adjacent natural tooth. Results. An excisional biopsy was performed and the dental implant was not removed. Histological examination provided the diagnosis of PGCG. After 19-month follow-up, there were no signs of recurrence of peri-implantitis around the implant. Conclusion. The correct diagnosis and appropriate surgical treatment of peri-implant giant cell granuloma are very important for a proper management of the lesion in order to preserve the implant prosthetic rehabilitation and prevent recurrences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraoral examination: note the exophytic mass on the palatal aspect associated with the canine and dental implant.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a, b) Peri-implant probing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Panoramic radiograph showing a radiolucent lesion surrounding the implant and the upper right canine.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a, b) Vestibular and palatal excisional biopsy of the lesion.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Suture of the surgical wound.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Histologic specimens.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(a, b) Follow-up after 7 days.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a, b, c) Clinical and radiological follow-up after 19 months.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Histologic examination (hematoxylin and eosin ×10).

References

    1. Katsikeris N., Kakarantza-Angelopoulou E., Angelopoulos A. P. Peripheral giant cell granuloma: clinicopathologic study of 224 new cases and review of 956 reported cases. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1988;17(2):94–99. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(88)80158-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flaitz C. M. Peripheral giant cell granuloma: a potentially aggressive lesion in children. Pediatric Dentistry. 2000;22(3):232–233. - PubMed
    1. Chaparro Avendaño A. V., Berini Aytés L., Gay Escoda C. Peripheral giant cell granuloma. A report of five cases and review of the literature. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2005;10(1):48–57. - PubMed
    1. Cawson R. A., Binnie W. H., Barrett A. W., Wright J. M. Patologia Orale. 3rd. Rome, Italy: Antonio Delfino Editore; 1999.
    1. Giansanti J. S., Waldron C. A. Peripheral giant cell granuloma: review of 720 cases. Journal of Oral Surgery. 1969;27(10):787–791. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources