Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;47(4):261-7.
doi: 10.3947/ic.2015.47.4.261. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

Polymicrobial Purulent Pericarditis Probably caused by a Broncho-Lymph Node-Pericardial Fistula in a Patient with Tuberculous Lymphadenitis

Affiliations

Polymicrobial Purulent Pericarditis Probably caused by a Broncho-Lymph Node-Pericardial Fistula in a Patient with Tuberculous Lymphadenitis

Seung Lee et al. Infect Chemother. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Purulent pericarditis is a rare condition with a high mortality rate. We report a case of purulent pericarditis subsequently caused by Candida parapsilosis, Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus, Streptococcus anginosus, Staphylococcus aureus, Prevotella oralis, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a previously healthy 17-year-old boy with mediastinal tuberculous lymphadenitis. The probable route of infection was a bronchomediastinal lymph node-pericardial fistula. The patient improved with antibiotic, antifungal, and antituberculous medication in addition to pericardiectomy.

Keywords: Bronchial fistula; Pericarditis; Polymicrobial infection; Tuberculous lymphadenitis; Tuberculous pericarditis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Anteroposterior chest radiograph; the cardiac silhouette is globularly enlarged and looks like a "water bottle".
Figure 2
Figure 2. Chest computed tomography. Transverse section image shows a large amount of pericardial effusion with pericardial enhancement (panel A). Multiple necrotic lymph nodes containing air density are observed in the pretracheal (panel B, arrow) and subcarinal areas (panel C, arrow). Coronal section image shows subcarinal lymph node with air density in contact with the parietal pericardium (panel D, arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Hospital course of the patient and identified pathogens from pericardial fluid cultures. Hospital day 2: The TB PCR text was positive for the initial pericardial fluid and also positive for those samples obtained at day 4 and 10. Hospital day 2 to 4: Serial AFB stains of sputum and pericardial fluid were all negative. Hospital day 3: The initial pericardial fluid culture yielded yeast growth. Hospital day 4: Candida parapsilosis was identified from the pericardial fluid and gram-positive cocci was observed in the pericardial fluid culture. Hospital day 7: AFB stain of pericardial fluid was positive. Hospital day 9: Polymicrobial pathogens were identified subsequently from the initial pericardial fluid culture. Hospital day 10: AFB stain of the pericardial fluid from the operation field was positive. TB cultures of pericardial fluid performed five times were all negative.
AFB, acid fast staining; TB PCR, tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction; INH, isoniazid; RFP, rifampin; EMB, ethambutol; PZA, pyrazinamide; HD, hospital day; MSSA, methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. aHD#1 - Culture was requested on hospital day 1. bPericardial fluid culture requested at hospital day 1 was reported at hospital day 4.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Anteroposterior chest radiograph obtained on day 7 of hospitalization; the cardiac silhouette decreased in size but a newly developed radiolucent lesion around the heart with left costophrenic angle blunting can be seen (arrows).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Chest computed tomography on day 7 of hospitalization: A transverse section image shows pericardial effusion was slightly decreased but multifocal air density and septations in pericardial space (panel A, arrow) were observed. In the coronal section image, subcarinal lymph node within air density (panel B, arrow) appears unchanged, and percutaneous pericardial drainage tube in pericardial space (panel B, arrowhead) is observed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maisch B, Seferović PM, Ristić AD, Erbel R, Rienmüller R, Adler Y, Tomkowski WZ, Thiene G, Yacoub MH Task Force on the Diagnosis and Management of Pricardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases executive summary; The Task force on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:587–610. - PubMed
    1. Shiber JR. Purulent pericarditis: Acute infections and chronic complications. Hosp Physician. 2008;44:9–18.
    1. Ferreira dos Santos L, Moreira D, Ribeiro P, Rodrigues B, Correia E, Nunes L, Sequeira M, Albuquerque A, Barros I, Saraiva JP, Santos O. Purulent pericarditis: a rare diagnosis. Rev Port Cardiol. 2013;32:721–727. - PubMed
    1. Rubin RH, Moellering RC., Jr Clinical, microbiologic and therapeutic aspects of purulent pericarditis. Am J Med. 1975;59:68–78. - PubMed
    1. Parsons R, Argoud G, Palmer DL. Mixed bacterial infection of the pericardium. South Med J. 1983;76:1046–1048. - PubMed