Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;50(5 Suppl 1):S74-S80.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.012. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

Retrospective Assessment of Cost Savings From Prevention: Folic Acid Fortification and Spina Bifida in the U.S

Affiliations

Retrospective Assessment of Cost Savings From Prevention: Folic Acid Fortification and Spina Bifida in the U.S

Scott D Grosse et al. Am J Prev Med. 2016 May.

Abstract

Introduction: Although fortification of food with folic acid has been calculated to be cost saving in the U.S., updated estimates are needed. This analysis calculates new estimates from the societal perspective of net cost savings per year associated with mandatory folic acid fortification of enriched cereal grain products in the U.S. that was implemented during 1997-1998.

Methods: Estimates of annual numbers of live-born spina bifida cases in 1995-1996 relative to 1999-2011 based on birth defects surveillance data were combined during 2015 with published estimates of the present value of lifetime direct costs updated in 2014 U.S. dollars for a live-born infant with spina bifida to estimate avoided direct costs and net cost savings.

Results: The fortification mandate is estimated to have reduced the annual number of U.S. live-born spina bifida cases by 767, with a lower-bound estimate of 614. The present value of mean direct lifetime cost per infant with spina bifida is estimated to be $791,900, or $577,000 excluding caregiving costs. Using a best estimate of numbers of avoided live-born spina bifida cases, fortification is estimated to reduce the present value of total direct costs for each year's birth cohort by $603 million more than the cost of fortification. A lower-bound estimate of cost savings using conservative assumptions, including the upper-bound estimate of fortification cost, is $299 million.

Conclusions: The estimates of cost savings are larger than previously reported, even using conservative assumptions. The analysis can also inform assessments of folic acid fortification in other countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Czeizel AE, Dudas I. Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(26):1832–1835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199212243272602. - DOI - PubMed
    1. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. Lancet. 1991;338(8760):131–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)90133-A. - DOI - PubMed
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Food standards: amendments of standards of identity for enriched grain products to require addition of folic acid. Federal Register. 1996;61:8781–8797.
    1. CDC CDC Grand Rounds: additional opportunities to prevent neural tube defects with folic acid fortification. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59(31):980–984. - PubMed
    1. Glasgow RE, Steiner JF. Comparative effectiveness research to accelerate translation: Recommendations for an emerging field of science. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health. Oxford University Press; New York, NY: 2012. pp. 72–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.003.0004. - DOI

Publication types